scholarly journals Random Field Ising Model: Dimensional Reduction or Spin-Glass Phase?

1995 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 987-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. De Dominicis ◽  
H. Orland ◽  
T. Temesvari
2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Krzakala ◽  
Federico Ricci-Tersenghi ◽  
Lenka Zdeborová

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos G. Fytas ◽  
Víctor Martín-Mayor ◽  
Marco Picco ◽  
Nicolas Sourlas

1979 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 2839-2846 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Katsura ◽  
S Fujiki ◽  
S Inawashiro

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 042003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Krzakala ◽  
Federico Ricci-Tersenghi ◽  
David Sherrington ◽  
Lenka Zdeborová

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Apratim Kaviraj ◽  
Slava Rychkov ◽  
Emilio Trevisani

Abstract We revisit perturbative RG analysis in the replicated Landau-Ginzburg description of the Random Field Ising Model near the upper critical dimension 6. Working in a field basis with manifest vicinity to a weakly-coupled Parisi-Sourlas supersymmetric fixed point (Cardy, 1985), we look for interactions which may destabilize the SUSY RG flow and lead to the loss of dimensional reduction. This problem is reduced to studying the anomalous dimensions of “leaders” — lowest dimension parts of Sn-invariant perturbations in the Cardy basis. Leader operators are classified as non-susy-writable, susy-writable or susy-null depending on their symmetry. Susy-writable leaders are additionally classified as belonging to superprimary multiplets transforming in particular OSp(d|2) representations. We enumerate all leaders up to 6d dimension ∆ = 12, and compute their perturbative anomalous dimensions (up to two loops). We thus identify two perturbations (with susy- null and non-susy-writable leaders) becoming relevant below a critical dimension dc ≈ 4.2 - 4.7. This supports the scenario that the SUSY fixed point exists for all 3 < d ⩽ 6, but becomes unstable for d < dc.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document