A submucosal tumor developing 15 years after endoscopic resection with additional chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer

Author(s):  
Ippei Tanaka ◽  
Dai Hirasawa ◽  
Daichi Togo
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole G. Jawitz ◽  
Vignesh Raman ◽  
Oliver K. Jawitz ◽  
Rahul A. Shimpi ◽  
Richard K. Wood ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Dobashi ◽  
Kenichi Goda ◽  
Noboru Yoshimura ◽  
Kazuki Sumiyama ◽  
Hirobumi Toyoizumi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 295-302.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vignesh Raman ◽  
Oliver K. Jawitz ◽  
Soraya L. Voigt ◽  
Chi-Fu J. Yang ◽  
David H. Harpole ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (06) ◽  
pp. E733-E742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Mora ◽  
Kenro Kawada ◽  
Yasuaki Nakajima ◽  
Takuya Okada ◽  
Yutaka Tokairin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are promising therapeutic options for early esophageal cancer (EC). The factors that can affect mid- and long-term survival in patients with submucosal EC (SM1 and SM2) have not been described in the literature. We aim to describe clinicopathological outcomes and factors that can affect the mid- and long-term survival in patients with resected submucosal tumors. Patients and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent endoscopic resection (ER) for submucosal tumors over a 20-year period. The final study population included 119 cases with 137 lesions. Information was collected according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 11-edition and factors affecting survival for 2 and 5 years after ER were analyzed. Results EMR was performed in 99 cases (72.3 %), ESD in 38 cases (27.7 %). There were no significant complications. Two- and 5-year survival rates were 91 % and 82 %, respectively. Mean age was 67.22 years (± 9.49 years), mortality caused by EC occurred in 13 cases (11 %). Factors that had a significant impact on long-term survival were age > 65 years (P = 0.0026), number of resected specimens (P = 0.0031), presence of another progressive disease (not EC) (P ≤ 0.001), recurrence (P = 0.0002), and relation between histopathological positive vertical margin and recurrence (P = 0.0112). Conclusions ER is viable treatment for esophageal submucosal cancer, selection between ESD/EMR can depend on tumor size and patient condition, and en bloc ER is the recommended technique for submucosal tumors. Long-term survival factors were identified.


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 3631-3636 ◽  
Author(s):  
RIEKO NAKAMURA ◽  
TAI OMORI ◽  
HIROYA TAKEUCHI ◽  
HIROFUMI KAWAKUBO ◽  
TSUNEHIRO TAKAHASHI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document