scholarly journals Rigorously Maintaining a “Targeted Depth of Insertion” for an Airway Exchange Catheter During Tracheal Tube Exchange

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 3414-3415
Author(s):  
Jonathan L. Benumof ◽  
John G. Augoustides
Author(s):  
Vattipalli Sameera ◽  
Konish Biswas ◽  
Girija P. Rath

Abstract Endotracheal tube (ETT) exchange is a common procedure performed in the operating room and intensive care unit for the purpose of changing damaged or soiled ETT with appropriate one. The exchange procedure is performed over an airway exchange catheter or ETT introducer (bougie). We report an event during ETT exchange over bougie wherein the introducer exited through Murphy’s eye. Here, we intend to re-emphasize the safety concerns pertaining to the use of bougie (with coude tip) as airway exchange conduit and enumerate the precautions to be taken during tube exchange.


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 832-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Toki ◽  
Y. Yamaguchi ◽  
T. Miyashita ◽  
S. Takaki ◽  
O. Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fredy-Michel Roten ◽  
Richard Steffen ◽  
Maren Kleine-Brueggeney ◽  
Robert Greif ◽  
Marius Wipfli ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: The dislocation rate of oral versus nasal airway exchange catheters (AEC) in the postoperative care unit (PACU) are unknown. Our aim was to establish dislocation rates and to assess the usefulness of waveform capnography to detect dislocation. METHODS: In this non-randomized, prospective observational trial at the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland, we included 200 patients admitted to PACU after extubation via AEC, having provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the local ethical committee. AEC position was assessed by nasal fiberoptic endoscopy at beginning of PACU stay and before removal of the AEC. Capnography was continuously recorded via the AEC. Additional measurements included retching and coughing of the patient, and re-intubation, if necessary. RESULTS: Data from 182 patients could be evaluated regarding dislocation. Overall dislocation rate was not different between oral and nasal catheters (7.2% vs. 2.7%, p=0.16). Retching was more often noted in oral catheters (26% vs. 8%, p<0.01). Waveform capnography was unreliable in predicting dislocation (negative predictive value 17%). Re-intubation was successful in all five of the nine re-intubations where an AEC was still in situ. In four patients, the AEC was already removed when re-intubation became necessary, and re-intubation failed once, with a front of neck access as a rescue maneuver. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in dislocation rate between nasal and oral position of an airway exchange catheter. However, nasal catheters seemed to be tolerated better. In the future, catheters like the staged extubation catheter may further increase tolerance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in a clinical study registry (ISRCTN 96726807) on 10/06/2010. KEYWORDS: Airway, extubation, intubation, airway exchange catheter, oral, nasal, postoperative, dislocation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document