Abstract
Background: Ebstein’s anomaly exhibits a wide variety of clinical features, and therefore, proposing a standardized treatment for it is difficult. This study was conducted to determine whether Cone repair, which has been implemented in our hospital since 2008, is more effective than conventional repair.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical information of patients with Ebstein’s anomaly who were followed-up at the hospital from 2000 to 2019. A total of 61 patients who had undergone tricuspid valve repair after 2000 were divided into the conventional and Cone repair groups and their clinical outcomes were compared.Results: Of the 170 patients, 82 (48.2%) patients received surgical treatment for the tricuspid valve, whereas 75 patients received only medical treatment. The median follow-up duration was 5.89 years. After surgery, tricuspid valve regurgitation decreased and aortic stroke volume increased in both the Cone and conventional repair groups. In the Cone repair group, no mortality and postoperative complete atrioventricular block occurred and significantly fewer cases of moderate to severe tricuspid valve regurgitation were noted after surgery compared with the conventional repair group.Conclusions: Cone repair is thought to be a method with less mortality and less occurrence of complete atrioventricular block than conventional repair.
Ebstein's Anomaly of the Tricuspid Valve: The Cone Repair
