Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: Better clinical midterm outcome after primary reverse Arthroplasty versus secondary reverse arthroplasty after failed ORIF in the elderly: Benefits of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for complex humeral fractures in the elderly

Author(s):  
Nadine Ott ◽  
Kilian Wegmann ◽  
Lena George ◽  
Christian Paul ◽  
Koroush Kabir
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1108-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Andrew Frombach ◽  
Kendra Brett ◽  
Peter Lapner

Acute proximal humeral fractures in the elderly are generally treated non-operatively if alignment is acceptable and in stable fracture patterns. When operative treatment is indicated, surgical fixation is often difficult or impossible to obtain. Hemiarthroplasty has long been the standard of care. However, with its reliance on tuberosity healing, functional outcomes and patient satisfaction are often poor. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has emerged as a new technology for treating proximal humeral fractures but the indications for its use remain uncertain. While not conclusive, the evidence suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty yields more consistent results, with improved forward elevation and higher functional outcome scores. The primary advantages of hemiarthroplasty are improved shoulder rotation and shorter operative time. Complication rates do not vary significantly between the two options. Although higher quality trials are needed to further define the role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, current evidence suggests that this is a reasonable option for surgeons who are highly familiar with its use.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Gigis ◽  
Alexandros Nenopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Giannekas ◽  
Roderich Heikenfeld ◽  
Theodoros Beslikas ◽  
...  

Background:Proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients present with severe comminution and osteoporotic bone quality.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has lately been proven beneficial in treating patients with complex proximal humeral fractures. The above technique is recommended and has better results in elderly than in younger individuals.Methods:We performed a literature search in the databases Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for published articles between 1970 and 2016 using the terms: proximal humerus fractures and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Results:Significant benefits with the use of reverse prosthesis, especially in patients older than 70 years with a proximal humeral fracture, include reduced rehabilitation time as well as conservation of a fixed fulcrum for deltoid action in case of rotator cuff failure.Compared with hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation, reverse prosthesis may be particularly useful and give superior outcomes in older patients, due to comminuted fractures in osteopenic bones.However, significant disadvantages of this technique are potential complications and a demanding learning curve.Therefore, trained surgeons should follow specific indications when applying the particular treatment of proximal humeral fractures and be familiar with the surgical technique.Conclusion:Although long-term results and randomized studies for reverse prosthesis are lacking, short and mid- term outcomes have given promising results encouraging more shoulder surgeons to use this type of prosthesis in proximal humeral fractures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 477-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Nilsskog Fraser ◽  
Jonas Bjørdal ◽  
Tone Mehlum Wagle ◽  
Anna Cecilia Karlberg ◽  
Odd Arve Lien ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1372-1379
Author(s):  
Xu Tian ◽  
Ming Xiang ◽  
Guangyu Wang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Junyang Liu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Luciano A. Rossi ◽  
Bruchmann Maria Guillermina ◽  
Martin Buljubasich ◽  
Nicolás Atala ◽  
Ignacio Tanoira ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document