Maxillary Canines in Patients With Multiple Congenitally Missing Teeth: A Roentgenographic Study

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yocheved Ben-Bassat ◽  
Ilana Brin
Keyword(s):  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing Teeth ◽  
Roentgenographic Study ◽  
Congenitally Missing

Dental Findings in Parents of Children with Cleft Lip and Palate

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 436-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Anderson ◽  
Anthony L.H., Moss
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Permanent Teeth ◽  
Dental Anomalies ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing

The incidence of dental abnormalities in the cleft lip and palate population has been reported to be much higher than in the normal population. The role of genes in the production of a cleft lip and palate, and dental anomalies is thought to be complex, with autosomal dominant, recessive, and x-linked genes all playing a role. Noncleft parents can carry some of the cleft lip and palate genes, which produce clinically subtle manifestations in their facial skeleton. The purpose of this study was to look for evidence of increased dental anomalies in the non-cleft parents of cleft lip and palate children. The dentitions of the parents of 60 children with different types of cleft lip and palate were examined prospectively to see whether or not they exhibited features found more readily in the cleft lip and palate rather than did the normal population. Their dentitions were studied to record the following dental features: congenitally missing teeth, supernumerary teeth, or morphologic changes of the crowns of the permanent teeth. The number and position of any frenal attachments were also recorded. The results of this study did not show any differences in incidence of dental anomalies from the noncleft population. There was no evidence to support the hypothesis that congenital absence of lateral incisors is a microform of cleft lip and palate. Further, these results also failed to reveal any consistent pattern in the number and position of frenal attachments.

scholarly journals HYPODONTIA WITH CLASS I MALLOCLUSION AND MAXILLARY DIASTEMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Bunga Fatimah ◽  
I Gusti Aju Wahju Ardani
Keyword(s):  
Case Management ◽  
Class I ◽  
Tooth Agenesis ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Facial Aesthetics ◽  
The Third ◽  
Congenitally Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing ◽  
Severe Type

Background: Dental agenesis is a term that refers to the absence of one or more teeth, and hypodontia refers to a severe type of tooth agenesis involving less than six or more than one congenitally missing teeth, excluding the third molars. Purpose: This aimed to report the correction of overbite by using intrusion archwires. Case: A 20-year-old female patient had class I malocclusion and deep overbite, incisor retroclination, mild mandibular crowding and agenesis of 12, 13, 14, 15, and 24. Case management: The case was treated with non-extraction using 0.022 pre-adjusted technique to level and unravel using intrusion archwires to correct the deep overbite. Conclusion: The 17-month treatment resulted in a corrected overbite, good occlusion, and good facial aesthetics.

scholarly journals Pre-Eruptive Coronal Resorption and Congenitally Missing Teeth in a Patient with Amelogenesis Imperfecta: A Case Report

2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 140-144
Author(s):  
Ozkan Miloglu ◽  
Osman Fatih Karaalioglu ◽  
Fatma Caglayan ◽  
Zeynep Duymus Yesil
Keyword(s):  
Autosomal Recessive ◽  
Autosomal Dominant ◽  
The Other ◽  
Amelogenesis Imperfecta ◽  
Clinical Report ◽  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing

ABSTRACTThis clinical report describes a male with autosomal recessive generalized hypoplastic amelogenesis imperfecta. This case is unusual in coronal resorptions prior to tooth eruption. This finding has been reported in some cases of autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant and X linked amelogenesis imperfecta (AI). In reported cases, the defects were usually small and occurred in a maximum of 2 teeth per person. In our case, pre-eruptive coronal resorptions affected three second molar teeth from both jaws. On the other hand; congenitally missing teeth and malocclusion were present in this case. Recall evaluations at 3 month intervals occurred for a period of 2 years and then prosthodontic management began. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:140-144)

scholarly journals Congenitally missing teeth and labio-palatal clefts: keep to the left

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 404
Author(s):  
Olivier Matern ◽  
Erik-André Sauleau ◽  
Pascal Tschill ◽  
Bruno Grollemund ◽  
Fabienne Perrin-Schmitt
Keyword(s):  
Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing Teeth ◽  
Congenitally Missing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document