Pediatric Spinal Ultrasound: Neonatal and Intraoperative Applications

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Alvarado ◽  
James Leach ◽  
Marguerite Caré ◽  
Francesco Mangano ◽  
Sara O׳Hara
Keyword(s):  
BMUS Bulletin ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Gillian Long
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. S. Terblanche ◽  
C. Arzola ◽  
K. E. Wills ◽  
R. Lawson ◽  
D. Blackford ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Arthie Jeyakumar ◽  
John J. Weaver ◽  
Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick ◽  
Anthony N. Hage ◽  
Kevin S. H. Koo ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 829-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Scottoni ◽  
Barbara Daniela Iacobelli ◽  
Antonio Maria Zaccara ◽  
Giorgia Totonelli ◽  
Antonio Maria Salvatore Schingo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 227-236
Author(s):  
Rafal Baraz

The use of ultrasound to aid location of the spinal and epidural space is not a new concept but has gained increasing popularity, particularly in woman who are obese, have abnormal spinal anatomy, or where regional placement has or is proving difficult. The benefits and challenges of spinal ultrasound imaging are discussed, with the methods to scan and obtain the right views or planes with the supporting images for spinal and epidural techniques. The use of ultrasound to perform a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is also illustrated. The chapter concludes with a section on the additional applications of ultrasound for vascular access and gastric volume estimation.


Author(s):  
Nermeen A. Tawfik ◽  
Ahmed Tohamy Ahmed ◽  
Tarek E. El-Shafei ◽  
Mohamed R. Habba

Author(s):  
Steven de Reuver ◽  
Rob C. Brink ◽  
Timothy T. Y. Lee ◽  
Yong-Ping Zheng ◽  
Frederik J. A. Beek ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients are exposed to 9–10 times more radiation and a fivefold increased lifetime cancer risk. Radiation-free imaging alternatives are needed. Ultrasound imaging of spinal curvature was shown to be accurate, however, systematically underestimating the Cobb angle. The purpose of this study is to create and cross-validate an equation that calculates the expected Cobb angle using ultrasound spinal measurements of AIS patients. Methods Seventy AIS patients with upright radiography and spinal ultrasound were split randomly in a 4:1 ratio to the equation creation (n = 54) or validation (n = 16) group. Ultrasound angles based on the spinous processes shadows were measured automatically by the ultrasound system (Scolioscan, Telefield, Hong Kong). For thoracic and lumbar curves separately, the equation: expected Cobb angle = regression coefficient × ultrasound angle, was created and subsequently cross-validated in the validation group. Results Linear regression analysis between ultrasound angles and radiographic Cobb angles (thoracic: R2 = 0.968, lumbar: R2 = 0.923, p < 0.001) in the creation group resulted in the equations: thoracic Cobb angle = 1.43 × ultrasound angle and lumbar Cobb angle = 1.23 × ultrasound angle. With these equations, expected Cobb angles in the validation group were calculated and showed an excellent correlation with the radiographic Cobb angles (thoracic: R2 = 0.959, lumbar: R2 = 0.936, p < 0.001). The mean absolute differences were 6.5°–7.3°. Bland–Altman plots showed good accuracy and no proportional bias. Conclusion The equations from ultrasound measurements to Cobb angles were valid and accurate. This supports the implementation of ultrasound imaging, possibly leading to less frequent radiography and reducing ionizing radiation in AIS patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document