The long-term effects of homeopathic treatment of chronic headaches: one year follow-up and single case time series analysis

2001 ◽  
Vol 90 (02) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Walach ◽  
T Lowes ◽  
D Mussbach ◽  
U Schamell ◽  
W Springer ◽  
...  

AbstractLittle is known about long-term effects of homeopathic treatment. Following a double-blind, placebo controlled trial of classical homeopathy in chronic headaches, we conducted a 1-year observational study of 18 patients following the double-blind phase, and a complete follow-up study of all trial participants. Eighteen patients received free treatment for daily diary data (frequency, intensity, duration of headaches) over the course of 1 y. All patients enrolled in the double-blind study were sent a 6-week headache diary, a follow-up questionnaire, a personality inventory and a complaint list. Eighty-seven, of the original 98 patients enrolled returned questionnaires, 81 returned diaries. There was no additional change from the end of the trial to the one-year follow-up. The improvement seen at the end of the 12-week trial was stable after 1 y. No differential effects according to treatment after the trial could be seen. Patients with no treatment following the trial had the most improvement after 1 y. Five of 18 patients can be counted responders according to ARIMA analysis of single-case time-series. Patients with double diagnoses and longer treatment duration tended to have clearer improvements than the rest of the patients. Approximately 30% of patients in homeopathic treatment will benefit after 1 y of treatment. There is no indication of a specific, or of a delayed effect of homeopathy.

Cephalalgia ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 835-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Walach ◽  
T Lowes ◽  
D Mussbach ◽  
U Schamell ◽  
W Springer ◽  
...  

Little is known about the long-term effects of homeopathic treatment. Following a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of classical homeopathy in chronic headaches, we conducted a complete follow-up study of all trial participants. All patients enrolled in the double-blind study were sent a 6-week headache diary, a follow-up questionnaire. Eighty-seven of the original 98 patients enrolled returned questionnaires, 81 returned diaries. There was no additional change from the end of the trial to the 1-year follow up. The improvement seen at the end of the 12-week trial was stable after 1 year. No differential effects according to treatment after the trial could be seen. Patients with no treatment following the trial had the most improvement after 1 year. Approximately 30% of patients in homeopathic treatment will benefit after 1 year of treatment. There is no indication of a specific, or of a delayed effect of homeopathy.


Author(s):  
Stefanie M.P. Kouwenhoven ◽  
Nadja Antl ◽  
Martijn J.J. Finken ◽  
Jos W.R. Twisk ◽  
Eline M. van der Beek ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. S742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirmala D. Markandu ◽  
Donald R.J. Singer ◽  
Giuseppe A. Sagnella ◽  
Francesco P. Cappuccio ◽  
A. L. Sugden ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 334 (8674) ◽  
pp. 1244-1247 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.A. Macgregor ◽  
G.A. Sagnella ◽  
N.D. Markandu ◽  
D.R.J. Singer ◽  
F.P. Cappuccio

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margot Phillips ◽  
Aine Lorie ◽  
John Kelley ◽  
Stacy Gray ◽  
Helen Riess

Objectives: This study is a 1-year follow-up investigation of the retention of the knowledge, attitudes and skills acquired after empathy training.Methods: Eight otolaryngology residents completed 5 assessment measures before and after empathy training and at 1-year. They attended a 90-minute focus group assessing clinical usefulness of the training, attitudes and factors that affect empathy.Results: Qualitative analysis revealed a positive response to the training and application of skills to clinical practices. Quantitative analyses suggest improvement in empathy after training was maintained at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.05). Knowledge of the neurobiology and physiology of empathy remained significantly greater than before the training (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Qualitative data indicate that the training program was well-received and helpful and follow-up focus groups provided physicians with opportunities for self-reflection and support from peers. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that improvement in self-reported empathy and objective knowledge of the neurobiology of emotions persist at 1-year follow-up. Accordingly, we recommend that empathy training and follow-up booster sessions become a standard component of residency training.


2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 107S-108S
Author(s):  
Sean P. Roddy ◽  
K.S. Vijayaraghavan ◽  
John J. Hallett ◽  
Thomas F. O'Donnell ◽  
Alan B. Lumsden ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard H. Fromm ◽  
Christopher F. Terrence ◽  
Amrik S. Chattha

1971 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. H. Wong ◽  
R. J. Cock

A controlled, double-blind study of haloperidol in 30 children suffering from severe emotional disorders was attempted. Toxic and side-effects and reduction of symptoms were observed over a prolonged period of medication. A battery of tests was designed to study any adverse effects on development and learning processes. The conclusions reached indicated that at an overall level and in terms of diagnostic categories, no statistical significance was established when compared with placebo. However, haloperidol is significantly superior to placebo in ameliorating particular symptoms, is a relatively safe drug, and it did not impair intellectual functioning and learning tasks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document