Sequential multistenting protocol in biliary stenosis after liver transplantation: a prospective analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1130-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Tarantino ◽  
Michele Amata ◽  
Noemi Cicchese ◽  
Dario Ligresti ◽  
Luca Barresi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Biliary complications are a serious source of morbidity after orthotopic and living-related liver transplantation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is the gold standard for patients with duct-to-duct anastomosis because it allows a direct approach for interventional procedures. A retrospective study showed results of a sequential multistenting protocol, without stent removal/exchange, with promising results. We conducted a prospective analysis to assess the clinical success, recurrence rate, and adverse event rate related to this protocol. Methods From May 2012 to April 2018, all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of anastomotic stenosis following liver transplantation were enrolled in the study, and were followed for a period of at least 6 months after the last ERC. During the first ERC, a maximum number of plastic stents (10 Fr) were placed. In subsequent ERCs, scheduled every 3 months up to a maximum of 1 year, additional stents were inserted, as many as possible, without removing the previously placed stents. Results From May 2012 to May 2018, 87 patients were included in the study and treated with a sequential multistenting protocol. The mean number of stents placed was 3.7 (SD 1.0). Clinical success (stricture resolution and normalization of cholestasis) was achieved in 86 patients (98.9 %). Seven patients (8.0 %) developed complications. Recurrence was recorded in seven patients (8.0 %) after a mean of 992.7 days (SD 622.1). Conclusions This study represents the first prospective demonstration of the efficacy and safety of a sequential multistenting protocol. A key limitation of the study is the lack of a comparative group treated according to the traditional stent exchange approach.

Author(s):  
Jin Taek Kim ◽  
Soo Hee Chang ◽  
Bo Hwa Choi ◽  
Kyung Mo Kim ◽  
Han Wook Yoo ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Hojo ◽  
T Ishibashi ◽  
T Yasuda ◽  
Y Sakuma ◽  
T Fujiwara ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 2160-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Harihara ◽  
M Makuuchi ◽  
H Kawarasaki ◽  
T Takayama ◽  
K Kubota ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Souto NACIF ◽  
Wanderley Marques BERNARDO ◽  
Luca BERNARDO ◽  
Wellington ANDRAUS ◽  
Lucas TORRES ◽  
...  

Context Biliary strictures after liver transplantation are recognized as its Achilles’ heel. The strictures are classified in anastomotic and ischemic or non-anastomotic biliary strictures, and they figure among the most common complications after liver transplantation. There are some treatment options including balloon dilation, the placement of multiple plastic stents and the placement of self-expandable metal stents and all of them seem to have good results. Objectives The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature concerning the results of the endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed on the management of anastomotic biliary strictures post- orthotopic liver transplantation. The Medline-PubMed, EMBASE, Scielo-LILACS, and Cochrane Databases were electronically searched from January 1966 to April 2013. Results No well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective comparisons in design. One study (86 patients) compared the endoscopic and the percutaneous accesses. The sustained clinical success rates were similar but the treatment duration was longer in the percutaneous group access. Two studies (56 patients) compared balloon dilation with balloon dilation and multiple plastic stents. There were no differences concerning sustained clinical success and complication rates. Conclusions Balloon dilation is as effective as balloon dilation plus multiple plastic stenting for the resolution of the anastomotic biliary strictures. Well-designed randomized trials are still needed to compare balloon dilation versus multiple plastic stenting versus metallic stenting.


2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 540-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Kimura ◽  
Toshimichi Hasegawa ◽  
Yoshiyuki Ihara ◽  
Sotaro Mushiake ◽  
Shigetoyo Kogaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document