Empfehlungen für das Management nicht spezifischer Rückenschmerzen

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Arne Vielitz
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Low Back

Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J 2018; 27: 2791–2803. doi: 10.1007/s00586–018–5673–2. Epub 2018 Jul 3

scholarly journals Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2791-2803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystian B. Oliveira ◽  
Chris G. Maher ◽  
Rafael Z. Pinto ◽  
Adrian C. Traeger ◽  
Chung-Wei Christine Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Low Back

scholarly journals Red flag screening for low back pain: nothing to see here, move along: a narrative review

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 493-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad E Cook ◽  
Steven Z George ◽  
Michael P Reiman
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Red Flags ◽  
Red Flag

Screening for red flags in individuals with low back pain (LBP) has been a historical hallmark of musculoskeletal management. Red flag screening is endorsed by most LBP clinical practice guidelines, despite a lack of support for their diagnostic capacity. We share four major reasons why red flag screening is not consistent with best practice in LBP management: (1) clinicians do not actually screen for red flags, they manage the findings; (2) red flag symptomology negates the utility of clinical findings; (3) the tests lack the negative likelihood ratio to serve as a screen; and (4) clinical practice guidelines do not include specific processes that aid decision-making. Based on these findings, we propose that clinicians consider: (1) the importance of watchful waiting; (2) the value-based care does not support clinical examination driven by red flag symptoms; and (3) the recognition that red flag symptoms may have a stronger relationship with prognosis than diagnosis.

Ottawa Panel evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on therapeutic massage for low back pain

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie Brosseau ◽  
George A. Wells ◽  
Stéphane Poitras ◽  
Peter Tugwell ◽  
Lynn Casimiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Therapeutic Massage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document