Wide Awake Hand Surgery and Therapy Tips

2022 ◽  
Keyword(s):  

Hand Clinics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. i
Author(s):  
Donald H. Lalonde ◽  
Jin Bo Tang
Keyword(s):  


Hand Clinics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro José Pires Neto ◽  
Samuel Ribak ◽  
Trajano Sardenberg


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Sang-Woo Kang ◽  
Young-Woo Kim ◽  
Ji-Kang Park
Keyword(s):  


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaco J Naude ◽  
Odette Koch ◽  
Ludwig W Schmidt ◽  
Theo LB le Roux

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to establish a subjective patient experience with wide awake local anaesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) procedures performed in the institution from May 2019 to March 2020. WALANT surgery was initiated to improve standard operating procedure and to decrease theatre burden METHODS: This prospective, descriptive study included 100 patients with a mean age of 59 years who required either a carpal tunnel or trigger finger release. The patients' pain experience was documented on the visual analogue scale (VAS) for the local anaesthetic injection and the surgical procedure. Overall experience was assessed on the patient's preference to have the procedure performed by the WALANT method or the conventional method RESULTS: One hundred patients were included, of which 67 had medical comorbidities. The mean VAS score was 1.5 (SD±1.6) with pain on injection. The mean VAS pain score during the surgical procedure was 0.2 (SD±0.7). One hundred per cent of patients (100/100) felt they would do the WALANT outpatient procedure again instead of admission to hospital and surgery in the theatre. Two complications occurred related to wound care problems, and were successfully managed. None of the patients required reoperations for incomplete release of the carpal tunnel or trigger finger surgery CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that minor hand surgery using the WALANT protocol can be performed effectively and with high patient satisfaction rates in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic, and is a useful tool in the skillset of a hand surgeon Level of evidence: Level 4 Keywords: WALANT, hand surgery, trigger finger, carpal tunnel release





2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0003
Author(s):  
AS Amiruddin ◽  
AA Ahmad ◽  
AR Ahmad

Avulsion fracture of medial epicondyle fractures accounted for 30.77% of elbow fractures. Fixation is needed when the fragment displaced significantly. These cases were usually done under general anaesthesia / regional anaesthesia. We describe a novel technique of using WALANT to proceed with this surgery. Methods: A combination of lignocaine, 1:100000 epinephrine and 10:1 sodium bicarbonate with a safe limit of 7mg/kg for lignocaine and epinephrine is used. The operation was done with continuous visual analog score and vital signs monitoring until postoperatively. Range of motion and blood loss was monitored post fixation intraoperatively. In every patients who undergo an operation under WALANT technique, we will provide , IV Dynastat 40mg BD x 1/7, T Celebrex 200mg BD and T PCM 1g PRN x 1/52. Discussion: The limitation faced during the procedure is that, the local anaesthesia cannot reach the second cortex of the humerus. The problem arises when the drill bit touches the second cortex of the bone which will cause pain to the patient. To remedy this, we injected 5ml of the solution to the expected trajectory of the screw at the far cortex. However, the procedure does not need to go through second cortex of the bone, so this limitation is manageable. Results: Patient’s pain score remain 0-2 after administration of solution, throughout the surgery and postoperatively. Estimated blood loss was 80cc and range of motion was full post fixation intraoperatively. Conclusion: Screw fix medial epicondyle under WALANT is a good alternative for patients with multiple comorbids and high risk for surgery to be done under general anaesthesia. Patient remain comfortable throughout the procedure and post operatively. Range of motion can be assessed post fixation intaraoperatively thus allow light exercise post operatively which is good to prevent elbow stiffness. References: Ahmad AA., Yi LM., Ahmad AR Plating of Distal Radius Fracture Using the Wide-Awake Anesthesia Technique. Journal of Hand Surgery. (2018) 43 (11) , pp 1045. el- 1045.e5 -1045.e5



JAMA Surgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E. Sasor ◽  
Tyler A. Evans ◽  
Julia A. Cook ◽  
Elizabeth A. Lucich ◽  
William A. Wooden ◽  
...  




2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 292-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Line Lied ◽  
Grethe E. Borchgrevink ◽  
Vilhjalmur Finsen

Background: “Wide awake hand surgery”, where surgery is performed in local anaesthesia with adrenaline, without sedation or a tourniquet, has become widespread in some countries. It has a number of potential advantages and we wished to evaluate it among our patients. Methods: All 122 patients treated by this method during one year were evaluated by the surgeons and the patients on a numerical scale from 0 (best/least) to 10 (worst/most). Theatre time was compared to that recorded for a year when regional or general anaesthesia had been used. Results: The patients’ mean score for the general care they had received was 0.1 (SD 0.6), for pain during lidocaine injection 2.4 (SD 2.2), for pain during surgery 0.9 (SD 1.5), and for other discomfort during surgery 0.5 (SD 1.4). Eight reported that they would want general anaesthesia if they were to be operated again. The surgeons’ mean evaluation of bleeding during surgery was 1.6 (SD 1.8), oedema during surgery 0.4 (SD 1.1), general disadvantages with the method 1.0 (SD 1.6) and general advantages 6.5 (SD 4.3). The estimation of advantages was 9.9 (DS 0.5) for tendon suture. 28 patients needed intra-operative additional anaesthesia. The proportion was lower among trained hand surgeons and fell significantly during the study period. Non-surgical theatre time was 46 (SD 15) minutes during the study period and 55 (SD 22) minutes during the regional/general period (p < 0.001). This gain was cancelled out by a longer surgery time during the wide awake period. Conclusions: Wide awake surgery is fully acceptable to most patients. It has a number of advantages over general or regional anaesthesia, but we feel it is unlikely to improve the efficiency of the operating theatre.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document