Reverse Midpalmar Island Flap Transfer for Fingertip Reconstruction

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (03) ◽  
pp. 171-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shohei Omokawa ◽  
Ryotaro Fujitani ◽  
Yoshihiro Dohi ◽  
Yasuhito Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Yajima
1989 ◽  
Vol 71-B (4) ◽  
pp. 593-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Yoshimura ◽  
T Shimada ◽  
M Matsuda ◽  
M Hosokawa ◽  
S Imura

Microsurgery ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Yajima ◽  
Susumu Tamai ◽  
Akihiro Fukui ◽  
Hiroshi Ono ◽  
Yuji Inada

1998 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. 2368-2372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aycan Kayıkçıoğlu ◽  
Mustafa Akyürek ◽  
Tunç Safak ◽  
Ömer Özkan ◽  
Abdullah Keçik

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1094-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meisei Takeishi ◽  
Akihiko Shinoda ◽  
Atsuki Sugiyama ◽  
Keito Ui

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Usami ◽  
S. Kawahara ◽  
Y. Yamaguchi ◽  
T. Hirase

This fingertip reconstruction study retrospectively compared sensory recovery and active range of motion outcomes in neurovascular island advancement and reverse digital artery island flaps. Seventeen oblique triangular flaps and 14 reverse digital artery island flaps were performed for nail bed level fingertip amputations (Ishikawa subzone II). There was no significant difference between the two procedures in the Semmes–Weinstein monofilament test and range of motion results. For static and moving two-point discrimination tests, however, those with a reverse digital artery island flap required a longer period for sensory recovery compared to those with an oblique triangular advancement flap. This trend equilibrated at 12 months after surgery showing no significant difference in both static and moving two-point discrimination tests between the procedures.


Microsurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 719-720
Author(s):  
Yoshitsugu Hattori ◽  
Shoichi Imai ◽  
Runa Nakamura ◽  
Atsushi Niu

2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (8) ◽  
pp. 1171-1178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annika Arsalan-Werner ◽  
Natallia Brui ◽  
Isabella Mehling ◽  
Michael Schlageter ◽  
Michael Sauerbier

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serkan Yildirim ◽  
G??lden Avci ◽  
Mithat Akan ◽  
Tayfun Ak??z

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-286
Author(s):  
Jinha Park ◽  
Jin Soo Kim ◽  
Sung Hoon Koh ◽  
Dong Chul Lee ◽  
Si Young Roh ◽  
...  

Reconstruction of amputated fingertips is extremely challenging when the amputee is very small and severely crushed. Moreover, there are not many options if distal phalanx is exposed due to defects of soft tissue. We report a case of successful fingertip reconstruction in a 10-month-old girl using a subcutaneous island flap with a composite graft. Her fingertip of the right little finger was amputated stuck by the air purifier. Some soft tissue was lost from the stump and the bone was exposed. There was a very small amputee, and soft tissue was extremely little inside. Replantation was not possible because of the soft tissue defect. The composite graft was inadequate due to the exposure of distal phalanx and defect of soft tissue. Soft tissue island flap based terminal branch of the digital artery was transposed to cover the distal phalanx. After then, the amputee was grafted over the flap. After debridement, most of the soft tissue survived and 0.2×0.2 cm of skin defect was found, which was healed through secondary intention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document