Non-Medical Use of Prescription Stimulants and Illicit Use of Stimulants for Cognitive Enhancement in Pupils and Students in Germany

2010 ◽  
Vol 44 (02) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Franke ◽  
C. Bonertz ◽  
M. Christmann ◽  
M. Huss ◽  
A. Fellgiebel ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 253-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian J Teter ◽  
Sean Esteban McCabe ◽  
James A Cranford ◽  
Carol J Boyd ◽  
Saliy K Guthrie

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 719-729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niloofar Bavarian ◽  
Brian R. Flay ◽  
Patricia L. Ketcham ◽  
Ellen Smit

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksi Hupli

Purpose European studies have shown lower prevalence rates of prescription stimulant use for cognitive enhancement, especially among student populations, compared to North America. This difference requires more cross-country research of the various factors involved. To find out whether other parts of the globe are witnessing similar increases in extra-medical stimulant use, and how this might relate to cognitive enhancement, requires empirical study of local contexts. This paper aims to argue that the academic and public discussion on cognitive enhancement should consider the specific country context of drug policy and research and rethink which drugs are included under the term cognitive enhancement drugs. Design/methodology/approach This paper offers a general review and a sociological country comparison between the Netherlands and Finland, focusing not only on prescription stimulants used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder but also illicit amphetamines among young adults and methylphenidate use among Dutch and Finnish participants of the Global Drug Survey. This paper emphasises sociocultural perspectives and the importance of context in cognitive enhancement in general as the line between therapeutic and enhancement use can often be blurred. Data is drawn from global, European and national sources, including the International Narcotics Control Board, European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction and Global Drug Survey. Findings There are hardly any national empirical studies done on cognitive enhancement drug use in Finland. On the other hand, there have been studies in the Netherlands showcasing that the use of prescription stimulants and other drugs for enhancement purposes is something that is happening among young people, albeit yet in a relatively small scale. Illicit and licit stimulant use and drug policy action in relation to cognitive enhancement drugs in the two countries varies, emphasising the importance of country context. Originality/value Given that cross-country research is scarce, this general review provides one of the first glimpses into cognitive enhancement drug use by comparing the country context and research in Finland, where the phenomenon has not been studied, with the Netherlands, where the topic has received more research and public attention. Further research areas are suggested.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-133
Author(s):  
Niloofar Bavarian ◽  
Stephanie Sumstine ◽  
Sheena Cruz ◽  
Jocelyne Mendez ◽  
Cassandra Schroeder ◽  
...  

To examine the prevalence, characteristics, and utility of ecological theory in explaining prescription stimulant misuse, a probability sample of 499 students from one southern California university (response rate = 94.71%) completed a 100-item paper-based survey. The illicit use of prescription stimulants (IUPS) during college was reported by approximately 21% of students, with approximately 13% of users reporting 10 or more occurrences per academic term. Characteristics of use that were examined suggest a growing trend toward recreational use. We used structural equation modeling to replicate a previously tested ecological model. The number of significant paths in this replication study (i.e., 22) was similar to the number of significant paths in the original study (i.e., 25), and 21 of the significant paths from the original study retained their significance in the replication. Results confirm prescription stimulant misuse remains prevalent, characteristics of the behavior are cause for concern, and ecological theories are a useful tool for explaining the multifaceted nature of IUPS.


2013 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 665-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niloofar Bavarian ◽  
Brian R. Flay ◽  
Patricia L. Ketcham ◽  
Ellen Smit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document