scholarly journals Orbital Floor Reconstruction with Free Flaps after Maxillectomy

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leela Mohan C. S. R. Sampathirao ◽  
Krishnakumar Thankappan ◽  
Sriprakash Duraisamy ◽  
Naveen Hedne ◽  
Mohit Sharma ◽  
...  

Background The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of orbital floor reconstruction with free flaps after maxillectomy. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 34 consecutive patients who underwent maxillectomy with orbital floor removal for malignancies, reconstructed with free flaps. A cross-sectional survey to assess the functional and esthetic outcome was done in 28 patients who were alive and disease-free, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. Results Twenty-six patients had bony reconstruction, and eight had soft tissue reconstruction. Free fibula flap was the commonest flap used ( n = 14). Visual acuity was normal in 86%. Eye movements were normal in 92%. Abnormal globe position resulted in nine patients. Esthetic satisfaction was good in 19 patients (68%). Though there was no statistically significant difference in outcome of visual acuity, eye movement, and patient esthetic satisfaction between patients with bony and soft tissue reconstruction, more patients without bony reconstruction had abnormal globe position ( p = 0.040). Conclusion Free tissue transfer has improved the results of orbital floor reconstruction after total maxillectomy, preserving the eye. Good functional and esthetic outcome was achieved. Though our study favors a bony orbital reconstruction, a larger study with adequate power and equal distribution of patients among the groups would be needed to determine this. Free fibula flap remains the commonest choice when a bony reconstruction is contemplated.

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e2543
Author(s):  
Christoph Koepple ◽  
Ann-Katrin Kallenberger ◽  
Lukas Pollmann ◽  
Gabriel Hundeshagen ◽  
Volker J. Schmidt ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. NINKOVÍC ◽  
A. H. SCHWABEGGER ◽  
G. WECHSELBERGER ◽  
H. ANDERL

The reconstruction of large palmar defects of the hand remains a difficult problem due to the specific anatomical structures and highly sophisticated function of the palm. The glabrous skin and subcutaneous tissue in the palm are perfectly adapted to serve the prehensile function. The particular aim must be that repairs to this functional structure are similar in texture and colour and are aesthetically acceptable. Restoration of sensibility is desirable. For smaller defects a great variety of local pedicled or island flaps can be applied. However, for larger defects with exposed tendons, nerves or other essential structures, free flaps remain as a reliable alternative. This paper reviews our approach of soft tissue reconstruction in 16 patients with large palmar defects using various kinds of free flaps. The advantages, disadvantages and current indications for free flap resurfacing of the palm are discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Özlenen ÖZKAN ◽  
Kerim ÜNAL ◽  
Onur OĞAN ◽  
Anı ÇİNPOLAT ◽  
Gamze BEKTAŞ ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 711-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel EY. Claes ◽  
Nathalie A. Roche ◽  
Dries Opsomer ◽  
Edward J. De Wolf ◽  
Casper E. Sommeling ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farooq Shahzad ◽  
Evan Matros

Plastic surgeons are typically called upon to reconstruct the chest wall in four situations: oncologic resection, infections, trauma and osteoradionecrosis. In this chapter we will discuss post-oncologic reconstruction. Chest wall reconstruction following tumor resection is typically performed at the same setting as the ablative surgery; this results in quicker patient recovery and overall better outcomes. The reconstruction should be planned with the ablative surgeon so that an assessment can be made of the extent of resection and available donor sites for reconstruction. The major components of reconstruction are 1) skeletal support and 2) soft tissue coverage. Skeletal support is indicated if the defect is >5 cm, 4 or more ribs are removed or more than 2/3rd of the sternum is resected. Prosthetic mesh is most commonly used. Soft tissue reconstruction is performed with regional pedicled flaps in the vast majority of cases. Free flaps are used when regional flaps are not sufficient (large defects) or not available.  This review contains 11 figures, 3 tables, and 49 references. Keywords: chest wall, tumor, skeletal reconstruction, soft tissue reconstruction, mesh, acellular dermal matrix, titanium osteosynthesis systems, resorbable plates, pedicled flaps, free flaps


Soft tissue coverage of open fractures with well-vascularised tissues should be performed within 72 hours of injury or at the same time as internal fixation. It may be in the form of local or free flaps, and may comprise muscle, fasciocutaneous tissues, or both. Flap selection depends on multiple factors, including the size and location of the defect following wound excision, availability of flaps, and donor site morbidity. Local flaps are usually used to cover defects with a limited zone of injury. Anastomoses for free flaps should be performed outside the zone of injury. Experimental data suggest that coverage with muscle leads to improved healing of fractures. However, there is currently little clinical evidence to support the use of one form of soft tissue cover over another for open fractures of the lower limb. The plastic surgeon must always consider the donor site morbidity of the flap(s) chosen.


Sarcoma ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Grinsell ◽  
Claudia Di Bella ◽  
Peter F. M. Choong

Soft-tissue reconstruction following preoperative radiotherapy and wide resection of soft tissue sarcoma remains a challenge. Pedicled and free tissue transfers are an essential part of limb sparing surgery. We report 22 cases of sarcoma treated with radiotherapy and wide excision followed by one-stage innervated free or pedicled musculocutaneous flap transfers. The resection involved the upper limb in 3 cases, the lower limb in 17, and the abdominal wall in 2. The flaps used for the reconstruction were mainly latissimus dorsi and gracilis. The range of motion was restored fully in 14 patients. The muscle strength of the compartment reconstructed was of grades 4 and 5 in all patients except one. The overall function was excellent in all the cases with functional scores of 71.2% in the upper limb and 84% in the lower limb. The only 2 major complications were flap necrosis, both revised with another flap, one of which was innervated with restoration of function. Innervated flaps are valuable alternatives for reconstruction after sarcoma resection in the extremity and in the abdominal wall. The excellent functional results are encouraging, and we believe that innervated muscle reconstruction should be encouraged in the treatment of sarcoma after radiotherapy and wide resection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document