Surgical Details in the Hearing Preservation Surgery of Acoustic Neuroma

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Zanoletti ◽  
C. Faccioli ◽  
A. Martini ◽  
A. Mazzoni
Skull Base ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Biroli ◽  
Antonio Mazzoni ◽  
Camillo Foresti ◽  
Antonio Signorelli

Skull Base ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (03) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Kanzaki ◽  
Kaoru Ogawa ◽  
Yasuhiro Inoue ◽  
Ryuzo Shiobara

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Author(s):  
S. Franchella ◽  
D. Borsetto ◽  
T. Mazzocco ◽  
D. Cazzador ◽  
E. Zanoletti

1997 ◽  
Vol 107 (8) ◽  
pp. 1043-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moisés A. Arriaga ◽  
Douglas A. Chen ◽  
Takanori Fukushima

Neurosurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Diaz Day ◽  
Douglas A. Chen ◽  
Moises Arriaga

Abstract THE TRANSLABYRINTHINE APPROACH has been popularized during the past 30 years for the surgical treatment of acoustic neuromas. It serves as an alternative to the retrosigmoid approach in patients when hearing preservation is not a primary consideration. Patients with a tumor of any size may be treated by the translabyrinthine approach. The corridor of access to the cerebellopontine angle is shifted anteriorly in contrast to the retrosigmoid approach, resulting in minimized retraction of the cerebellum. Successful use of the approach relies on a number of technical nuances that are outlined in this article.


2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank M. Warren ◽  
David M. Kaylie ◽  
Joseph M. Aulino ◽  
C. Gary Jackson ◽  
Jane L. Weissman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document