Gains Realized in Pituitary Carcinoma Survival: A Contemporary Evaluation Using the Seer Database

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Wallace ◽  
Anand K. Devaiah
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Wallace ◽  
Anand K. Devaiah

Abstract Background Pituitary carcinomas are challenging tumors to diagnose and treat due to their rarity and limited data surrounding their etiology. Traditionally, these patients have exhibited poor survival. Over the last several decades, our understanding of pituitary carcinomas has dramatically increased, and there have been recent initiatives to improve patient access to health care, including the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This study investigates whether there were any changes in incidence and treatment outcomes of pituitary carcinoma that correlated with these advances. Methods A retrospective case review was conducted utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute. Those with primary site pituitary tumors with noncontiguous metastases were identified from 1975 to 2016. Demographic data, overall, and cause-specific outcomes were obtained. The data were analyzed using SPSS to generate 5-year Kaplan–Meier curves. Results The incidence of pituitary carcinoma pre- and post-ACA was 0.31 and 2.14 diagnoses/year, respectively. This represents a significant increase (Chi-square, p < 0.00002). In addition, 1-, 2-, and 5-year overall survival of these patients was determined to be 88.2, 74.0, and 66.6% which was significantly improved compared with prior studies. Cause-specific survival of these patients follow similar trends exhibiting 94.1, 79.0, 71.1% after 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Conclusion The survival for pituitary carcinoma has improved significantly which signals a change in how practitioners should counsel their patients. There is a significant surge in the number of cases in the post-ACA timeline, which suggests that improving patient access has played a part in wider recognition and treatment initiation for this disease.


2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara M. Hansen ◽  
Sachin Batra ◽  
Michael Lim ◽  
Gary L. Gallia ◽  
Peter C. Burger ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Kenneth Rodriguez ◽  
Anthony Morrison

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Anne M. Rosenberg ◽  
William F. Young ◽  
Ronald L. Richardson ◽  
Bernd W. Scheithauer
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (03) ◽  
pp. 77-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Eschner ◽  
Frank Grünwald ◽  
Michael Lassmann ◽  
Frederik Verburg ◽  
Markus Luster ◽  
...  

ZusammenfassungDie Verfahrensanweisung zur Radioiodtherapie beim differenzierten Schilddrüsenkarzinom (Version 4) wurde von einer repräsentativen Expertengruppe im informellen Konsens verabschiedet und entspricht damit einer Leitlinie der ersten Stufe (S1) nach den Kriterien der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). Die Verfahrensanweisung ergänzt die S2-Leitlinie zur operativen Behandlung maligner Schilddrüsenerkrankungen um die nuklearmedizinischen Aspekte. Bezüglich der Indikationsstellung zur ablativen Radioiodtherapie beim kleinen papillären Schilddrüsenkarzinom und beim minimal invasiven follikulären Schilddrüsenkarzinom ohne Angioinvasion, bezüglich der empirischen Bemessung der 131I-Therapieaktivität sowie bezüglich der exogenen versus endogenen TSH-Stimulation bei der ablativen Radio-iodtherapie werden Handlungskorridore beschrieben. Der Text enthält die Auswertungen aus der National Cancer Database und der SEER-Database (jeweils USA), wonach die ablative Radioiodtherapie bereits in einer Niedrig-Risiko Konstellation die Überlebensrate verbessert. Der statistische Nachweis eines solchen Nutzens setzt ein nationales Krebsregister mit Langzeitdaten voraus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document