SINGLE-OPERATOR PERORAL CHOLANGIOSCOPY-GUIDED LITHOTRIPSY FOR DIFFICULT BILIARY STONES - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Moreira ◽  
D Costa ◽  
G Alexandrino ◽  
J Fernandes ◽  
T Araújo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. AB373
Author(s):  
João Fernandes ◽  
Marta Moreira ◽  
Dalila Costa ◽  
Gonçalo Alexandrino ◽  
Tarcísio Araújo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 1381-1388
Author(s):  
Arthur E. Laquière ◽  
Jocelyn Privat ◽  
Fabien Fumex ◽  
Philippe Grandval ◽  
Laurence Lecomte ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. E54-E58 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Wong ◽  
Raymond Tang ◽  
Anthony Teoh ◽  
Joseph Sung ◽  
James Lau

Abstract Background/study aims Laser lithotripsy can effectively fragment complicated biliary stones, but current cholangioscopes are limited by fragility, restricted mobility or moderate visual resolution. The efficacy and safety of a new digital single-operator peroral cholangioscope to guide laser lithotripsy were evaluated. Patients and methods In this prospective single-center series, consecutive patients with complicated biliary stones, defined as impacted stones > 1.5 cm in size and wider than the more distal common bile duct, or stones that failed extraction by basket mechanical lithotripsy, underwent ERCP and SpyGlass DS peroral cholangioscope (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, United States)-guided laser lithotripsy. Stone clearance rate and incidence of adverse events were determined. Results Seventeen patients (10 men, 7 women; median age 76 years) with a median biliary stone size of 2 cm underwent predominantly holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet laser lithotripsy, achieving a 94 % stone clearance rate over 1 median procedure. Lithotripsy was performed in 8 of 17 patients due to an impacted biliary stone. The remaining patients underwent lithotripsy due to prior failure of the basket mechanical lithotripter to capture or crush their stones. Post lithotripsy, 2 patients developed cholangitis and 1 patient with underlying COPD developed respiratory distress, all resolved with conservative management. There were no hemobilia, perforations, pancreatitis nor any deaths. Conclusion SpyGlass DS peroral cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy is an efficient and safe modality for management of complicated biliary stones.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Maida ◽  
G Morreale ◽  
E Sinagra ◽  
M Manganaro ◽  
D Schillaci ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (21) ◽  
pp. 825-833
Author(s):  
Zoltán Döbrönte ◽  
Mária Szenes ◽  
Beáta Gasztonyi ◽  
Lajos Csermely ◽  
Márta Kovács ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recent guidelines recommend routine pulse oximetric monitoring during endoscopy, however, this has not been the common practice yet in the majority of the local endoscopic units. Aims: To draw attention to the importance of the routine use of pulse oximetric recording during endoscopy. Method: A prospective multicenter study was performed with the participation of 11 gastrointestinal endoscopic units. Data of pulse oximetric monitoring of 1249 endoscopic investigations were evaluated, of which 1183 were carried out with and 66 without sedation. Results: Oxygen saturation less than 90% was observed in 239 cases corresponding to 19.1% of all cases. It occurred most often during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (31.2%) and proximal enteroscopy (20%). Procedure-related risk factors proved to be the long duration of the investigation, premedication with pethidine (31.3%), and combined sedoanalgesia with pethidine and midazolam (34.38%). The age over 60 years, obesity, consumption of hypnotics or sedatives, severe cardiopulmonary state, and risk factor scores III and IV of the American Society of Anestwere found as patient-related risk factors. Conclusion: To increase the safety of patients undergoing endoscopic investigation, pulse oximeter and oxygen supplementation should be the standard requirement in all of the endoscopic investigation rooms. Pulse oximetric monitoring is advised routinely during endoscopy with special regard to the risk factors of hypoxemia. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 825–833.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document