Repair of Partial Lesions with Nerve Grafting Methods in the Rat Tibial Nerve

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M Kerns ◽  
Tejashree S Malushte ◽  
Theodore Nagel ◽  
Susan Shott ◽  
John Safanda ◽  
...  
Microsurgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-152
Author(s):  
James M. Kerns ◽  
Eduard H. Sladek ◽  
Tejashree S. Malushte ◽  
Harold Bach ◽  
Bassem Elhassan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. e41-e45
Author(s):  
Haodong Lin ◽  
Desong Chen ◽  
Chunlin Hou

Background In sciatic nerve neuropathies, when direct nerve repair is impossible due to a large gap, nerve grafting can be performed. However, the diameters of traditional autologous nerve grafts are too small to cover the whole cross-sectional area of the sciatic nerve. The aim of this study is to present the outcome of common peroneal nerve grafting to repair the tibial nerve in eight patients with sciatic nerve injuries, showing long defects of more than 10 cm. Methods Between 2007 and 2013, the common peroneal nerve was used as an autograft to repair the tibial nerve in eight patients with complete high sciatic nerve injury with long defects. There were 6 men and 2 women with an average age of 31 years (range: 17–44 years). Muscle strength was evaluated using the British Medical Research Council scale. The Semmes–Weinstein monofilament test was used for sensory evaluation. Results The follow-up time for patients ranged from 36 to 60 months, with an average of 48.75 months. Tibial nerve motor function was “good” or “very good” (M3–M4) in five out of eight patients (55.6%). Plantar flexion was not adequate in the rest of the patients. Sensory recovery was “good” or “very good” (S2–S3) in six patients and “inadequate” (S4) in two patients. Conclusion In cases where there were extensive gaps in the sciatic nerve, using the common peroneal nerve as an autograft to repair the tibial nerve provides an alternative to traditional nerve graft repair.


Microsurgery ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Kerns ◽  
Eduard H. Sladek ◽  
Tejashree S. Malushte ◽  
Harold Bach ◽  
Bassem El-hassan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
pp. 237-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lukas Rasulic ◽  
Miroslav Samardzic

Foot & Ankle ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 489-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Nunley ◽  
Gerard T. Gabel

Five patients with a segmental loss of the tibial nerve and insensate plantar aspect of the foot were evaluated at an average of 5 years (2.5–9.5) postsural nerve grafting of the tibial nerve. Free-tissue transfer was required in three patients. The results as graded by restoration of superficial sensation, healing of plantar ulceration, and absence of neurogenic pain were four good and one fair at follow-up over 2 years. Assessment at 2 years or less yielded one good and four poor results, indicating a prolonged recovery period. Nerve grafting may be indicated in segmental injuries of the tibial nerve to restore plantar sensation, but ultimate recovery may require up to 4 years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document