Sonography-Aided Computer-Assisted Surgery in Orbital and Parapharyngeal Skull Base Surgery

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Maier ◽  
Petra Lohnstein
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Computer Assisted

scholarly journals Optical and electromagnetic tracking for navigated surgery of the sinuses and frontal skull base

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-368
Author(s):  
F. Kral ◽  
E.J. Puschban ◽  
H. Reichelmann ◽  
F. Pedross ◽  
W. Freysinger
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Target Position ◽  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Optical Tracking ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Electromagnetic Tracking ◽  
Software Environment ◽  
Titanium Screws ◽  
Frontal Skull Base

BACKGROUND: New hardware and software algorithms in electromagnetic tracking for computer assisted surgery (CAS) have been developed. We aimed to compare electromagnetic tracking for navigated procedures in frontal skull base surgery to optical tracking. METHODS: Target registration error (TRE) was determined in 6 anatomic specimens in an experimental wet-lab. As targets, 6 titanium screws were evenly distributed over the surgical areas of interest from the frontal sinus to the clivus. Optical tracking and electromagnetic tracking was evaluated in identical software environment using a last generation commercially available navigation system. RESULTS: Submillimetric application accuracy could be achieved with both tracking modalities. Optical was more accurate than electromagnetic tracking and its reliability was better. Target position did not influence TRE, however TRE varied significantly from skull to skull. CONCLUSIONS: Although less accurate than optical tracking, electromagnetic tracking still offers excellent accuracy and reliability for anterior skull base surgery. Electromagnetic tracking is not dependent on direct line of sight between its hardware components and therefore easily integrated even in cluttered operating theatres.

Accuracy and Practicability of Different Referencing Methods in Computer-Assisted Surgery of the Lateral Skull Base

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Stelter ◽  
Christoph Matthias ◽  
Kathrin Spiegl ◽  
Christian Lübbers ◽  
Andreas Leunig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Lateral Skull Base

Sonographically Aided Computer-Assisted Surgery at the Skull Base—Risks and Limitations

Skull Base ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Maier ◽  
Petra Lohnstein ◽  
Joerg Schipper
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Computer Assisted

Computer-assisted intraoperative navigation during skull base surgery

1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo L. Carrau ◽  
Carl H. Snyderman ◽  
Hugh D. Curtin ◽  
Ivo P. Janecka ◽  
Michael Stechison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Navigation ◽  
Computer Assisted

Use of bone anchoring device in electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation in lateral skull base surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 133 (10) ◽  
pp. 1047-1052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Bernardeschi ◽  
Yann Nguyen ◽  
Aude Villepelet ◽  
Evelyne Ferrary ◽  
Stephane Mazalaigue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Assisted Navigation ◽  
Lateral Skull Base

Navigation as a tool to visualize bone-covered hidden structures in transfrontal approaches

2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (11) ◽  
pp. 849-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joerg Schipper ◽  
Wolfgang Maier ◽  
Iakovos Arapakis ◽  
Uwe Spetzger ◽  
R. Laszig
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Frontal Sinus ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Surgical Simulation ◽  
Bone Destruction ◽  
Computer Assisted Surgery ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Navigation Systems ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Frontal Skull Base

A retrospective analysis of 10 patients was performed to evaluate navigation systems in extranasal frontal skull base surgery. When performing a craniotomy following a bicoronal skin incision, the surgeon has to calculate the extent of the frontal sinus to avoid unnecessary damage to the dura or mucoceles later. Due to surgical morbidity including compression of the frontal lobe, many skull base surgeons have refused to use such an approach. Malformation or bone-destruction complicates the identification of the borders and increases the risk ofside-effects. Navigation systems can be an alternative for calculating the frontal sinus outlines during surgery. In the authors’ surgical procedure two different navigation systems were used. Conventional surgery using the transfrontal, transbasal or subcranial approach consisting of trepanation and craniotomy were performed, while the navigated surgical procedure was evaluated.The analysis showed that computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is applicable to extranasal frontalskull base surgery. In comparison to X-ray beam-controlled craniotomy, CAS is beneficial as it constitutes a noninvasive instrument of quality management. Furthermore, the analysis indicatedthat under the guidance of a navigation system a precise pre-surgical simulation is available in order to perform an optimal craniotomy and reconstruction of the frontal skull base.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document