Transvaginal Ultrasonography Compared with Endometrial Biopsy for the Detection of Endometrial Disease

1997 ◽  
Vol 337 (25) ◽  
pp. 1792-1798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Langer ◽  
June J. Pierce ◽  
Katherine A. O'Hanlan ◽  
Susan R. Johnson ◽  
Mark A. Espeland ◽  
...  
Maturitas ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 192
Author(s):  
P. Lopes ◽  
M. Zenatti ◽  
M. Cartier ◽  
S. Lecanuet ◽  
V. Delance ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Noor Ayesha Begum ◽  
Lokesh Chandra H. C. ◽  
Ravindra S. Pukale

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding is the most common presenting menstrual complaint in women of perimenopausal age group. Most frequently used diagnostics tests to investigate the causes of abnormal bleeding are Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and endometrial biopsy. Uterine curettage is an invasive procedure and is performed with anaesthesia. TVS is a non-invasive method that has been used to evaluate the endometrium and uterine cavity. The objectives of this study were to measure and evaluate the role and accuracy of endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasonography study to detect endometrial pathology in perimenopausal women presenting with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. To correlate the transvaginal sonographic results with the Histopathological findings to discriminate normal from pathological endometrium.Methods: Prospective study including 150 perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial thickness was measured by TVS and then D and C was performed for all the patients.Results: Out of 150 women, 128 (85.3%) had normal and 22 (15%) had an abnormal endometrium. 43.3% were of 41-45 years and 65.3% patients presented with complaint of heavy menstrual bleeding. Majority of the patients in the study group were para 2 or more. Fibroid uterus (24%) was the commonest uterine pathology detected on TVS. 53.3% of patients had endometrial thickness in the range 10-14.9 mm. Most common finding on HPE was secretory endometrium (44.6%). Endometrial carcinoma was found in 3%. Endometrial thickness <14mm was associated with least abnormal endometrial pathology.Conclusions: Endometrial thickness of less than 14 mm need not be indicated for D and C in perimenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding. In perimenopausal women with AUB, TVS should be the investigation of choice due to its convenience, accuracy and non- invasiveness.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moradan S ◽  
Ghorbani R ◽  
Far M

Introduction: Endometrial biopsy is usually considered unnecessary in post-menopausal uterine bleeding when the endometrial thickness (ET) is less than 5 mm because the risk of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer is low. However, there is still much controversy from this as some believe that the diagnostic value of ET in diagnosis of endometrial pathology (EP) in postmenopausal bleeding is necessary. In this study, the diagnostic value of ET for diagnosis of EP in post-menopausal bleeding was evaluated. Materials and methods: Sixty post-menopausal women with uterine bleeding were evaluated. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) was used for measurement of ET followed by dilatation and curettage in a one-day interval. According to the EP, patients were divided in two groups, normal and abnormal. Endometrial atrophy was considered as normal and hyperplasia, polyps and carcinoma was considered as abnormal. Results: Twenty nine cases had ET more than 6 mm, among them, 25 cases had abnormal pathology (hyperplasia, polyp, cancer) and 4 cases were normal (atrophy). Thirty-one patients had ET equal or less than 6mm, among them, 26 cases were normal (atrophy) and 5 cases had abnormal pathology. The sensitivity, specifi ty, positive and negative predictive values of TVS in the diagnosis of uterine pathology were 83.3%, 86.7%, 86.2%, 83.9% respectively. Conclusion: We suggest that an ET of less than 6 mm in TVS is unlikely to indicate EP in post-menopausal women with uterine bleeding.


Maturitas ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Hänggi ◽  
Niklaus Bersinger ◽  
Hans Jörg Altermatt ◽  
Martin Hans Birkhäuser

Author(s):  
Mishika Bhoj ◽  
Shakti Kumar Yadav

Background: The most common cause of postmenopausal bleeding is benign pathology, but likelihood of malignancy must be promptly excluded. As excision of localized lesion has higher disease-free survival rate and lower morbidity as opposed to treatment for regional-stage disease. Commonly employed blind dilatation and curettage followed by histopathology is the current standard. A screening method with high sensitivity and specificity can help to prevent the invasive procedure and can also improve the accuracy of the biopsy. The objective of the present study was to study and compare the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy and transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosis of postmenopausal bleeding.Methods: 80 female patients with complaints of postmenopausal bleeding were enrolled and followed up for a period of 10 months. Each patient underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy followed by endometrial biopsy. Result were analyzed to find sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV taking histopathological diagnosis as gold standard.Results: Authors found that in 40 patients (50%), the cause of post-menopausal bleeding was caused atrophic endometrium followed by endometrial hyperplasia seen in 14 patients (17.5%). Hysteroscopy had higher overall sensitivity, specificity, NPV and accuracy as compared to transvaginal ultrasonography. Hysteroscopy was found to be highly accurate in diagnosing endometrial carcinoma (100%) and endometrial polyps (100%). However, both methods showed similar accuracy (97.5%) in diagnosis of proliferative endometrium and hyperplasia.Conclusions: Hysteroscopy is comparable to histopathology and superior to transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of intrauterine causes for postmenopausal bleeding, it also offers the possibility of visualizing macroscopic or focal intra-uterine abnormalities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document