scholarly journals Direct current simulation in acrylic box using 3D finite element method

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. A. Laksono ◽  
S. Zulaikah ◽  
S. Sunaryo ◽  
H. Heriyanto ◽  
S. Hidayat
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
3D Finite Element Method ◽  
Element Method

Multiple linear system techniques for 3D finite element method modeling of direct current resistivity

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-wei Li ◽  
Bin Xiong ◽  
Jian-ke Qiang ◽  
Yu-zeng Lü
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Linear System ◽  
Direct Current ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Finite Element Method Modeling ◽  
3D Finite Element Method ◽  
Element Method

Dynamic Analysis of 2D Electromagnetic Resonant Optical Scanner Using 3D Finite Element Method

2010 ◽  
Vol 130 (9) ◽  
pp. 1102-1107
Author(s):  
Katsuhiro Hirata ◽  
Sara Hong ◽  
Kengo Maeda
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Dynamic Analysis ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Optical Scanner ◽  
3D Finite Element Method ◽  
Element Method

Analysis of Magnetic Properties on the Outer Rotor Type Hybrid Stepping Motors Using 3D Finite Element Method

2005 ◽  
Vol 125 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-191
Author(s):  
Yuji Enomoto ◽  
Kenji Miyata ◽  
Kazuo Oonishi ◽  
Yasuaki Motegi
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Magnetic Properties ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Outer Rotor ◽  
3D Finite Element Method ◽  
Rotor Type ◽  
Element Method

Thermomechanical simulation of seamless tube rolling using a 3D finite element method

1994 ◽  
Vol 45 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sola ◽  
M. Vacance ◽  
E. Massoni ◽  
J.-L. Chenot
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Seamless Tube ◽  
Tube Rolling ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Thermomechanical Simulation ◽  
3D Finite Element Method ◽  
Element Method

scholarly journals Analysis of submerged implant towards mastication load using 3D finite element method (FEM)

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Widia Hafsyah Sumarlina Ritonga ◽  
Janti Rusjanti ◽  
Nunung Rusminah ◽  
Aldilla Miranda ◽  
Tatacipta Dirgantara
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Method ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Contact Area ◽  
Maximum Stress ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
3D Finite Element ◽  
Alveolar Crest ◽  
Component Design ◽  
3D Finite Element Method ◽  
Element Method

Introduction: The surgical procedure of dental implant comprising one stage surgery for the non-submerged implant design and two stages for submerged. Submerged design is frequently used in Faculty of Dentistry Padjadjaran University as it is safer in achieving osseointegration. This study has been carried out to evaluate resistant capacity of an implant component design submerged against failure based on location and the value of internal stress during the application of mastication force using the 3D Finite Element Method (FEM). Methods: The present study used a CBCT radiograph of the mandibular patient and Micro CT Scan of one submerged implant. Radiograph image was then converted into a digital model of 3D computerized finite element, subsequently inputted the material properties and boundary condition with 87N occlusion load applied and about 29N for the shear force. Results: The maximum stress was found located at the contact area between the implant and alveolar crest with stress value registered up to 193.31MPa located within an implant body where is understandable that this value is far below allowable strength of titanium alloy of 860 MPa. Conclusion: The location of the maximum stress was located on the contact area between the implant-abutment and alveolar crest. This implant design is acceptable and no failure observed under mastication load.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document