scholarly journals Dual vortex breakdown in a two-fluid confined flow

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 061706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor V. Naumov ◽  
Bulat R. Sharifullin ◽  
Mikhail A. Tsoy ◽  
Vladimir N. Shtern
2020 ◽  
Vol 1677 ◽  
pp. 012076
Author(s):  
B. R. Sharifullin ◽  
I. V. Naumov ◽  
M. A. Tsoy ◽  
V. N. Shtern

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 104107
Author(s):  
Luis Carrión ◽  
Igor V. Naumov ◽  
Bulat R. Sharifullin ◽  
Miguel A. Herrada ◽  
Vladimir N. Shtern

2020 ◽  
Vol 1675 ◽  
pp. 012015
Author(s):  
I V Naumov ◽  
B R Sharifullin ◽  
V N Shtern

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 4750-4753 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mununga ◽  
K. Hourigan ◽  
M. C. Thompson ◽  
T. Leweke

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Carrion ◽  
I. V. Naumov ◽  
B. R. Sharifullin ◽  
M. A. Herrada ◽  
V. N. Shtern

1998 ◽  
Vol 370 ◽  
pp. 73-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. SPOHN ◽  
M. MORY ◽  
E. J. HOPFINGER

The steady-state flow generated by a rotating bottom in a closed cylindrical container and the resulting vortex breakdown bubbles have been studied experimentally. By comparing the flow inside two different container geometries, one with a rigid cover and the other with a free surface, we examined the way in which the formation and structure of the breakdown bubbles depend on the surrounding flow. Details of the flow were visualized by means of the electrolytic precipitation technique, whereas a particle tracking technique was used to characterize the whole flow field. We found that the breakdown bubbles inside the container flow are in many ways similar to those in vortex tubes. First, the bubbles are open with in- and outflow and second, their structure is, like in the case of vortex breakdown in pipe flows, highly axisymmetric on the upstream side of the bubble and asymmetric on their rear side. However, and surprisingly, we observed bubbles which are open and stationary at the same time. This shows that open breakdown bubbles are not necessarily the result of periodic oscillations of the recirculation zone. The asymmetry of the flow structure is found to be related to the existence of asymmetric flow separations on the container wall. If the angular velocity of the rotating bottom is increased the evolution of the breakdown bubbles is different in both configurations: in the rigid cover case the breakdown bubbles disappear but persist in the free surface case.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 014101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor V. Naumov ◽  
Bulat R. Sharifullin ◽  
Vladimir N. Shtern

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey G. Skripkin ◽  
Bulat R. Sharifullin ◽  
Igor V. Naumov ◽  
Vladimir N. Shtern

AbstractLooking for an optimal flow shape for culture growth in vortex bioreactors, an intriguing and impressive structure has been observed that mimics the strong swirling flows in the atmosphere (tornado) and ocean (waterspout). To better understand the flow nature and topology, this experimental study explores the development of vortex breakdown (VB) in a lab-scale swirling flow of two immiscible fluids filling a vertical cylindrical container. The rotating bottom disk drives the circulation of both fluids while the sidewall is stationary. The container can be either sealed with the still top disk (SC) or open (OC). As the rotation strength (Re) increases, a new circulation cell occurs in each fluid—the dual VB. In case SC, VB first emerges in the lower fluid at Re = 475 and then in the upper fluid at Re = 746. In case OC, VB first emerges in the upper fluid at Re = 524 and then in the lower fluid at Re = 538. The flow remains steady and axisymmetric with the interface and the free surface being just slightly deformed in the studied range of Re. Such two-VB swirling flows can provide efficient mixing in aerial or two-fluid bioreactors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. T. Brady ◽  
M. Herrmann ◽  
J. M. Lopez
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document