scholarly journals Structure of the Super Neutronised Doubly Closed Shell Nucleus 132Sn

1992 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupayan Bhattacharya

The scenario of single particle (proton as well as neutron) states near the Fermi surface of 132Sn has been investigated on the basis of an average one-body potential suitably optimised for 208Pb and then extrapolated to the mass region concerned. The calculation shows excellent agreement with experiment. The ground state charge distribution of the nucleus has also been calculated.


1990 ◽  
Vol 31 (21) ◽  
pp. 2987-2990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan R Katritzky ◽  
Marl Karelson


1988 ◽  
Vol 212 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Soundranayagam ◽  
A. Saha ◽  
Kamal K. Seth ◽  
C.W. de Jager ◽  
H. de Vries ◽  
...  


1992 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1656-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Kim ◽  
J. P. Connelly ◽  
J. H. Heisenberg ◽  
F. W. Hersman ◽  
T. E. Milliman ◽  
...  


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 679-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. MODARRES ◽  
N. RASEKHINEJAD ◽  
H. MARIJI

The ground state properties of light closed shell nuclei, i.e. 4He, 12C, 16O, 28Si, 32S, 40Ca and 56Ni are studied by using the channel-dependent effective two-body interactions (CDEI's). The CDEI's are generated through the lowest-order constrained variational (LOCV) calculation for asymmetric nuclear matter with the charge-dependent Av18 bare nucleon–nucleon potential. The work is performed on the harmonic oscillator basis, and the local density approximation is applied to create the relative and the center of mass dependent effective two-body potential. Unlike nuclear matter, and similar to our previous calculations with the Reid68 interaction, while the Av18 potential under binds above nuclei up J max = 2 channel, it gives ground state binding energies closer to the experimental data with respect to the Δ- Reid68 and the Reid68 potentials. There are not much difference between the results of Av18 interaction with J max = 5, and those of Reid68Day potential which has been define up to J max = 5. The different CDEI's up to J max = 5 are discussed and the results of our calculations are compared with the other theoretical approaches and experimental data. Finally, it is shown that the contributions of higher partial waves (J>2) are not very important and the two-body kinetic energy in J = 1 channel is roughly twice as that of J = 0 which is not the case for the two-body potential energy.





1977 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 821-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
S W Brain ◽  
A Johnston ◽  
W A Gillespie ◽  
E W Lees ◽  
R P Singhal


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document