A Bayesian Latent Variable Selection Model for Nonignorable Missingness

Author(s):  
Han Du ◽  
Craig Enders ◽  
Brian Tinnell Keller ◽  
Thomas N. Bradbury ◽  
Benjamin R. Karney
2001 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zvi Drezner ◽  
George A. Marcoulides ◽  
Mark Hoven Stohs

We illustrate how a comparatively new technique, a Tabu search variable selection model [Drezner, Marcoulides and Salhi (1999)], can be applied efficiently within finance when the researcher must select a subset of variables from among the whole set of explanatory variables under consideration. Several types of problems in finance, including corporate and personal bankruptcy prediction, mortgage and credit scoring, and the selection of variables for the Arbitrage Pricing Model, require the researcher to select a subset of variables from a larger set. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the Tabu search variable selection model, we: (1) illustrate its efficiency in comparison to the main alternative search procedures, such as stepwise regression and the Maximum R2 procedure, and (2) show how a version of the Tabu search procedure may be implemented when attempting to predict corporate bankruptcy. We accomplish (2) by indicating that a Tabu Search procedure increases the predictability of corporate bankruptcy by up to 10 percentage points in comparison to Altman's (1968) Z-Score model.


2016 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 190-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-Qing Zhang ◽  
Guo-Liang Tian ◽  
Nian-Sheng Tang

Author(s):  
Emmanuel O. Ogundimu

AbstractSample selection arises when the outcome of interest is partially observed in a study. A common challenge is the requirement for exclusion restrictions. That is, some of the covariates affecting missingness mechanism do not affect the outcome. The drive to establish this requirement often leads to the inclusion of irrelevant variables in the model. A suboptimal solution is the use of classical variable selection criteria such as AIC and BIC, and traditional variable selection procedures such as stepwise selection. These methods are unstable when there is limited expert knowledge about the variables to include in the model. To address this, we propose the use of adaptive Lasso for variable selection and parameter estimation in both the selection and outcome submodels simultaneously in the absence of exclusion restrictions. By using the maximum likelihood estimator of the sample selection model, we constructed a loss function similar to the least squares regression problem up to a constant, and minimized its penalized version using an efficient algorithm. We show that the estimator, with proper choice of regularization parameter, is consistent and possesses the oracle properties. The method is compared to Lasso and adaptively weighted $$L_{1}$$ L 1 penalized Two-step method. We applied the methods to the well-known Ambulatory Expenditure Data.


2001 ◽  
Vol 34 (25) ◽  
pp. 463-468
Author(s):  
Baibing Li ◽  
Elaine Martin ◽  
Julian Morris

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document