scholarly journals Methodological Considerations on Regional Sustainability Assessment Based on Multicriteria and Sensitivity Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 261-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Munda ◽  
Michaela Saisana
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergiy Smetana ◽  
Christine Tamásy ◽  
Alexander Mathys ◽  
Volker Heinz

Author(s):  
Nathalie Bertrand ◽  
Laurence Jones ◽  
Berit Hasler ◽  
Luigi Omodei-Zorini ◽  
Sandrine Petit ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 3756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Lindfors ◽  
Roozbeh Feiz ◽  
Mats Eklund ◽  
Jonas Ammenberg

Many cities of the world are faced with multiple sustainability challenges, for example related to food and energy supply, transportation, waste management, clean air, and more. Preferably, these challenges are addressed with broad and interconnected solutions with the ambition of addressing several challenges simultaneously, in this paper referred to as multi-functional urban solutions. Implementation of multi-functional urban solutions requires well informed decisions, supported by knowledge about the potential contributions that the solutions can make to a more sustainable city as well as on issues that may hinder or facilitate their implementation. Thus, in this paper, we suggest a soft multi-criteria decision analysis method that can be used to gather and structure this knowledge. This method acknowledges the importance of incorporating local knowledge, is based on life-cycle thinking, and is flexible and open-ended by design so that it can be tailored to specific needs and conditions. The method contributes to existing practices in sustainability assessment and feasibility studies, linking and integrating potential and performance assessment with issues affecting solutions’ feasibility of implementation. This method offers a way for local authorities, researchers and exporting companies to organize and structure the diverse range of knowledge to be considered for more informed decisions regarding the implementation of multi-functional urban solutions. While the main contributions of the paper are methodological, brief descriptions of two studies that have applied this method to assess biogas solutions are shown as clarifying examples. One of these studies was performed in Chisinau, Moldova and the other in Johannesburg, South Africa.


2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 646-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Mascarenhas ◽  
Pedro Coelho ◽  
Eduarda Subtil ◽  
Tomás B. Ramos

2004 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 511-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
HERRERA RODRIGO JILIBERTO

This paper is an attempt to develop a holarchical paradigm for regional sustainability assessment based on a critic of the epistemology of sustainability, seen as between two polar opposites that make up a unified system. On the one hand we find what can be described as a representationalist view, for which sustainability is the result of juxtaposing certain economic, social and environmental aspects of reality. However, complexity and uncertainty are the most relevant epistemological results of trying to define sustainability as an "objective" entity derived from an analytical perspective. On the other hand, complexity and uncertainty lead to the conclusion that sustainability cannot be expressed and, therefore, the problem of what to do does not depend so much on the description of the object we want to act on, but on how we decide what to do. This is the procedural epistemology of sustainability. The methodological and epistemological proposal that has guided the development of the Sustainable Development Strategy for the Region of Murcia, for instance, is equidistant from these two options. It is based on the belief that it is necessary and possible to constitute sustainability as an analytically coherent (i.e. non-arbitrary) object of knowledge, which is at the same time autonomous from the analytical–fragmentary descriptions that comprise standard scientific knowledge. In the centre of this epistemology is a systemic understanding of "reality" that tries to grasp the hierarchical inter-existence of the outer world, and focuses primarily on contingent management from a dynamic viewpoint rather than that of certainty. This epistemological dual perspective has many implications for evaluation practice, both in the framing of technical analysis, and in the management of social participation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document