Five strains of Histophilus ovis (9L, 642A, 714, 5688T, and 3384Y) were investigated with respect to iron acquisition. All strains used ovine, bovine, and goat transferrins (Tfs), but not porcine or human Tfs, as iron sources for growth. In solid phase binding assays, total membranes from only two (9L and 642A) of the five strains, grown under iron-restricted conditions, were able to bind Tfs (ovine, bovine, and goat, but not porcine or human). However, when the organisms were grown under iron-restricted conditions in the presence of bovine transferrin (Tf), total membranes from all strains exhibited Tf binding (as above); competition experiments demonstrated that all three Tfs (ovine, bovine, and goat) were bound by the same receptor(s). Membranes from organisms grown under iron-replete conditions in the presence or absence of bovine Tf failed to bind any of the test Tfs. An affinity-isolation procedure allowed the isolation of two putative Tf-binding polypeptides (78 and 66 kDa) from total membranes of strains 9L and 642A grown under iron-restricted conditions, and from membranes of all strains if the growth medium also contained Tf. It is concluded that all strains tested acquire Tf-bound iron by means of siderophore-independent mechanisms involving surface receptors analogous to the Tf-binding proteins (TbpA and TbpB) found in comparable organisms; although iron restriction alone is sufficient to promote the expression of these proteins by strains 9L and 642A, their production by strains 714, 5688T, and 3384Y appears to require two signals, iron restriction and the presence of Tf.Key words: Histophilus ovis, iron acquisition, transferrins, receptors, regulation.
Cleavage of diferric bovine transferrin into two monoferric fragments