Counting Carbon: Quantifying Biomass in the McMurdo Dry Valleys through Orbital & Field Observations

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (22) ◽  
pp. 8597-8623
Author(s):  
Mark R. Salvatore ◽  
John E. Barrett ◽  
Schuyler R. Borges ◽  
Sarah N. Power ◽  
Lee F. Stanish ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. McKay

AbstractDry permafrost on Earth is unique to the Antarctic and is found in the upper elevations of the McMurdo Dry Valleys. Despite its widespread presence in the Dry Valleys, the factors that control the distribution of dry permafrost and the ice-cemented ground below it are poorly understood. Here I show, by a combination of theoretical analysis and field observations, that the recurrence of snow can explain the depth of dry permafrost and the location of ice-cemented ground in Antarctica. For data from Linnaeus Terrace at 1600–1650 m elevation in Upper Wright Valley a recurrence intervals of about two years explains the presence of ground ice at 25 cm depth, under 12.5 cm of dry permafrost. Snow recurrence periods longer than 10 years would create only dry permafrost at this site. The snow gradient in University Valley resulting from the windblown snow from the polar plateau creates a corresponding gradient in the depth to ice-cemented ground. On the floor of Beacon Valley, the presence of dry permafrost without underlying ice-cemented ground indicates snow recurrence intervals of more than 10 years and implies that the ancient massive ice in this valley is not stable. Snow recurrence may also set the depth to ground ice on Mars.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin Castendyk ◽  
◽  
Maciej K. Obryk ◽  
Sasha Z. Leidman ◽  
Michael Gooseff ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melisa A. Diaz ◽  
◽  
Susan A. Welch ◽  
Kathleen A. Welch ◽  
Alia L. Khan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate M. Swanger ◽  
◽  
Joerg M. Schaefer ◽  
Gisela Winckler

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melisa A. Diaz ◽  
◽  
Byron J. Adams ◽  
Alia L. Khan ◽  
Kathleen A. Welch ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 743-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac Garrido-Benavent ◽  
Ulrik Søchting ◽  
Asunción de los Ríos Murillo ◽  
Sergio Pérez-Ortega

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Stingl ◽  
J.-C. Cho ◽  
W. Foo ◽  
K. L. Vergin ◽  
B. Lanoil ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (234) ◽  
pp. 714-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHELLEY MACDONELL ◽  
MARTIN SHARP ◽  
SEAN FITZSIMONS

ABSTRACTCryoconite holes can be important sources and stores of water and nutrients on cold and polythermal glaciers, and they provide a habitat for various forms of biota. Understanding the hydrological connectivity of cryoconite holes may be the key to understanding the transport of nutrients and biological material to the proglacial areas of such glaciers. This paper aims to characterize and explain spatial variability in the connectivity of ice-lidded cryoconite holes on a small, piedmont glacier in the McMurdo Dry Valleys through geochemical analysis of cryoconite hole waters. Solute concentrations in both surface and near-surface ice and cryoconite holes, vary greatly along the glacier centerline, and all sample types displayed similar spatial patterns of variability. Using chloride as a tracer, we estimated variations in cryoconite hole connectivity along the glacier centerline. We found that a previously used mass transfer method did not provide reliable estimates of the time period for which cryoconite hole waters had been isolated from the atmosphere. We attribute this to spatial variability in both the chloride content of the surface ice and surface ablation rates. The approach may, however, be used to qualitatively characterize spatial variations in the hydrological connectivity of the cryoconite holes. These results also suggest that ice-lidded cryoconite holes are never truly isolated from the near-surface drainage system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document