HEALTH RESPONSES OF NEW YORK CITY FIREFIGHTER SPOUSES AND THEIR FAMILIES POST-SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 TERRORIST ATTACKS

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 905-917 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Menendez ◽  
Janice Molloy ◽  
Maryann Corrigan Magaldi
2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 809-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Pulcino ◽  
Sandro Galea ◽  
Jennifer Ahern ◽  
Heidi Resnick ◽  
Mary Foley ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1295-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Vlahov ◽  
S. Galea ◽  
J. Ahern ◽  
S. Rudenstine ◽  
H. Resnick ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 304-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerry Fairbrother ◽  
Jennifer Stuber ◽  
Sandro Galea ◽  
Alan R. Fleischman ◽  
Betty Pfefferbaum

2002 ◽  
Vol 346 (13) ◽  
pp. 982-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Galea ◽  
Jennifer Ahern ◽  
Heidi Resnick ◽  
Dean Kilpatrick ◽  
Michael Bucuvalas ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1449-1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Gaissmaier ◽  
Gerd Gigerenzer

Terrorists can strike twice—first, by directly killing people, and second, through dangerous behaviors induced by fear in people’s minds. Previous research identified a substantial increase in U.S. traffic fatalities subsequent to the September 11 terrorist attacks, which were accounted for as due to a substitution of driving for flying, induced by fear of dread risks. Here, we show that this increase in fatalities varied widely by region, a fact that was best explained by regional variations in increased driving. Two factors, in turn, explained these variations in increased driving. The weaker factor was proximity to New York City, where stress reactions to the attacks were previously shown to be greatest. The stronger factor was driving opportunity, which was operationalized both as number of highway miles and as number of car registrations per inhabitant. Thus, terrorists’ second strike exploited both fear of dread risks and, paradoxically, an environmental structure conducive to generating increased driving, which ultimately increased fatalities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-183
Author(s):  
Esther Martinez-Pastor ◽  
Clara Simón-de-Blas

The aim of this paper is to contrast whether cognitive memory and emotional recall related to a tragic event and exposure to advertisements that evoke such an experience generates a negative emotional change in the target. We performed an experiment that analyzes emotional changes derived from advertisements featured in the national press ten years after terrorist attacks. We chose the attacks: September 11, 2001, in New York City, and March 11, 2004, in Madrid and analyze the cognitive recall in a set of Spanish and United States focus groups. The results show a significant emotional change in the respondents after the advertisement visualization that is more strongly linked to the recall of a negative event than to the advertisement creativity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document