A procedure for model choice or variable selection with controlled model specification error

1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 483-497
Author(s):  
O. Bunke ◽  
B. Grabowski
Biometrics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenjing Yang ◽  
Yuhong Yang

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1079-1101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Hofner ◽  
Torsten Hothorn ◽  
Thomas Kneib

2019 ◽  
pp. 0739456X1985642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petter Næss

This commentary presents a critique of a particular, strictly quantitative way of reviewing research findings within the field of land use and transportation studies, so-called meta-analyses. Beyond criticism raised earlier, the article draws attention to serious bias resulting when meta-analysis include studies encumbered with model specification error due to poor understanding of causal mechanisms. The article also discusses underestimated limitations due to neglect of differences between geographical contexts and inconsistent measurement of variables across studies. An example of an alternative approach is offered at the end of the article.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 1550-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Bayarri ◽  
J. O. Berger ◽  
A. Forte ◽  
G. García-Donato

Biometrics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 626-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Kneib ◽  
Torsten Hothorn ◽  
Gerhard Tutz

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (06) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Binder ◽  
O. Gefeller ◽  
M. Schmid ◽  
A. Mayr

SummaryBackground: Boosting algorithms to simultaneously estimate and select predictor effects in statistical models have gained substantial interest during the last decade.Objectives: This review highlights recent methodological developments regarding boosting algorithms for statistical modelling especially focusing on topics relevant for biomedical research.Methods: We suggest a unified framework for gradient boosting and likelihood-based boosting (statistical boosting) which have been addressed separately in the literature up to now.Results: The methodological developments on statistical boosting during the last ten years can be grouped into three different lines of research: i) efforts to ensure variable selection leading to sparser models, ii) developments regarding different types of predictor effects and how to choose them, iii) approaches to extend the statistical boosting framework to new regression settings.Conclusions: Statistical boosting algorithms have been adapted to carry out unbiased variable selection and automated model choice during the fitting process and can nowadays be applied in almost any regression setting in combination with a large amount of different types of predictor effects.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cem Kocak

Linear time series methods are researched under 3 topics, namely, AR (autoregressive), MA (moving averages), and ARMA (autoregressive moving averages) models. On the other hand, the univariate fuzzy time series forecasting methods proposed in the literature are based on fuzzy lagged (autoregressive (AR)) variables, having not used the error lagged (moving average (MA)) variables except for only two studies in the fuzzy time series literature. Not using MA variables could cause the model specification error in solutions of fuzzy time series. For this reason, this model specification error should be eliminated. In this study, a solution algorithm based on artificial neural networks has been proposed by defining a new high order fuzzy ARMA time series forecasting model that contains fuzzy MA variables along with fuzzy AR variables. It has been pointed out by the applications that the forecasting performance could have been increased by the proposed method in accordance with the fuzzy AR models in the literature since the proposed method is a high order model and also utilizes artificial neural networks to identify the fuzzy relation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document