Regression to the mean: Error reduction versus blood pressure normalization by sports training

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-647
Author(s):  
Yi-Liang Chen ◽  
Ding-Peng Yeh ◽  
Shin-Da Lee ◽  
Chia-Hua Kuo
Electronics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 471
Author(s):  
Hyoju Seo ◽  
Yoon Seok Yang ◽  
Yongtae Kim

This paper presents an energy-efficient approximate adder with a novel hybrid error reduction scheme to significantly improve the computation accuracy at the cost of extremely low additional power and area overheads. The proposed hybrid error reduction scheme utilizes only two input bits and adjusts the approximate outputs to reduce the error distance, which leads to an overall improvement in accuracy. The proposed design, when implemented in 65-nm CMOS technology, has 3, 2, and 2 times greater energy, power, and area efficiencies, respectively, than conventional accurate adders. In terms of the accuracy, the proposed hybrid error reduction scheme allows that the error rate of the proposed adder decreases to 50% whereas those of the lower-part OR adder and optimized lower-part OR constant adder reach 68% and 85%, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed adder has up to 2.24, 2.24, and 1.16 times better performance with respect to the mean error distance, normalized mean error distance (NMED), and mean relative error distance, respectively, than the other approximate adder considered in this paper. Importantly, because of an excellent design tradeoff among delay, power, energy, and accuracy, the proposed adder is found to be the most competitive approximate adder when jointly analyzed in terms of the hardware cost and computation accuracy. Specifically, our proposed adder achieves 51%, 49%, and 47% reductions of the power-, energy-, and error-delay-product-NMED products, respectively, compared to the other considered approximate adders.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles N. Moore ◽  
Emily R. Atkins ◽  
Abdul Salam ◽  
Michele L. Callisaya ◽  
James L. Hare ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Atkinson ◽  
Jeremy P. Loenneke ◽  
Christopher A. Fahs ◽  
Takashi Abe ◽  
Lindy M. Rossow

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. e13-e14
Author(s):  
Adriana Branchi ◽  
Domenico Sommariva

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S63
Author(s):  
N. Wang ◽  
E. Atkins ◽  
A. Salam ◽  
M. Moore ◽  
J. Sharman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1184-1191
Author(s):  
Nelson Wang ◽  
Emily R. Atkins ◽  
Abdul Salam ◽  
Myles N. Moore ◽  
James E. Sharman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Salam ◽  
Emily Atkins ◽  
Johan Sundström ◽  
Yoichiro Hirakawa ◽  
Dena Ettehad ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
pp. 461-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. L. HESS ◽  
D. J. CARLSON ◽  
J. D. INDER ◽  
E. JESULOLA ◽  
J. R. MCFARLANE ◽  
...  

There exists no examination of what is the minimum anti-hypertensive threshold intensity for isometric exercise training. Twenty two normotensive participants were randomly assigned to training intensities at either 5 % or 10 % of their maximal contraction. Twenty participants completed the study. Clinical meaningful, but not statistically significant, reductions in systolic blood pressure were observed in both 5 % and 10 % groups –4.04 mm Hg (95 % CI –8.67 to +0.59, p=0.08) and –5.62 mm Hg (95 % CI –11.5 to +0.29, p=0.06) respectively after 6 weeks training. No diastolic blood pressure reductions were observed in either 5 % –0.97 mm Hg (95 % CI –2.56 to +0.62, p=0.20) or 10 % MVC +1.8 mm Hg (95 % CI –1.29 to +4.89, p=0.22) groups respectively after training. In those unable to complete isometric exercise at the traditional 30 % intensity, our results suggest there is no difference between 5 and 10 % groups and based on the principle of regression to the mean, this could mean both interventions induce a similar placebo-effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document