Illusory Recollection and Dual–Process Models of Recognition Memory

2004 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 714-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A. Higham ◽  
John R. Vokey
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Nyhus ◽  
Tim Curran

Dual process models suggest that recognition memory is supported by familiarity and recollection processes. Previous research administering amnesic drugs and measuring ERPs during recognition memory have provided evidence for separable neural correlates of familiarity and recollection. This study examined the effect of midazolam-induced amnesia on memory for details and the proposed ERP correlates of recognition. Midazolam or saline was administered while subjects studied oriented pictures of common objects. ERPs were recorded during a recognition test 1 day later. Subjects' discrimination of old and new pictures as well as orientation discrimination was worse when they were given midazolam instead of saline. As predicted, the parietal old/new effect was decreased with the administration of midazolam. However, weaker effects on FN400 old/new effects were also observed. These results provide converging pharmacological and electrophysiological evidence that midazolam primarily affects recollection as indexed by parietal ERP old/new effects and memory for orientation, while also exerting some weaker effects on familiarity as indexed by FN400 old/new effects.


1996 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Yonelinas ◽  
Ian Dobbins ◽  
Michael D. Szymanski ◽  
Harpreet S. Dhaliwal ◽  
Ling King

Author(s):  
John M. Gardiner ◽  
Ira Konstantinou ◽  
Irene Karayianni ◽  
Vernon H. Gregg

Abstract. A remember-know paradigm was used to assess memory awareness following speeded and unspeeded yes/no picture recognition. The beneficial effects of picture size congruency at study and test occurred with speeded as well as with unspeeded recognition. In each case, they were associated with remembering, not with knowing, which remained invariant. Thus, size congruency effects were associated with remembering even when recognition occurred more automatically and hence may be more dependent on a relatively fast familiarity process. In a second experiment, speeded remember responses were compared with remember responses that followed speeded yes/no recognition. There was more remembering when it was the remember responses that were speeded, contrary to what might be expected if remembering reflects a relatively slow recollection process. These results have implications for the ability of dual-process models of recognition memory to account for memory awareness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian M. Monroe ◽  
Bryan L. Koenig ◽  
Kum Seong Wan ◽  
Tei Laine ◽  
Swati Gupta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document