EFFECTS OF ADVANCE ORGANIZERS ON TEXT RECALL BY POOR READERS

Author(s):  
Steven D. Rinehart ◽  
Mary Alice Barksdale‐Ladd ◽  
William A. Welker
1985 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne T. Amlund ◽  
Janet Gaffney ◽  
Raymond W. Kulhavy

Two experiments evaluated the effect of map feature content on recall of text auded by subjects of varying reading skill levels. In Experiment 1, elementary students with below average reading skill studied a map with features represented by labels, symbols with labels, or mimetic drawings with labels before listening to text. Students who studied the mimetic map recalled significantly more map-featured text information than students who studied label or symbol maps. In Experiment 2, good and poor readers studied a mimetic or a label map prior to listening to text. While good readers recalled more map-featured and nonfeatured information than poor readers, no differences were found between map feature content conditions. Map-featured information was better recalled than nonfeatured information by all groups in both experiments. Data from both experiments provide support for the conjoint retention hypothesis.


1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Rinehart ◽  
William A. Welker

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Einar Mencl ◽  
Stephen J. Frost ◽  
Rebecca Sandak ◽  
Nicole Landi ◽  
Jay Rueckl ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Lorch ◽  
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Kemtes ◽  
Paul J. Schroeder ◽  
Britania Latronica ◽  
Lisa Barnes
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenai Hu ◽  
Maria Vender ◽  
Gaetano Fiorin ◽  
Denis Delfitto

Recent experimental results suggest that negation is particularly challenging for children with reading difficulties. This study looks at how young poor readers, speakers of Mandarin Chinese, comprehend affirmative and negative sentences as compared with a group of age-matched typical readers. Forty-four Chinese children were tested with a truth value judgment task. The results reveal that negative sentences were harder to process than affirmative ones, irrespective of the distinction between poor and typical readers. Moreover, poor readers performed worse than typical readers in comprehending sentences, regardless of whether they were affirmative or negative sentences. We interpret the results as (a) confirming the two-step simulation hypothesis, based on the result that the difficulty in processing negation has a general validity (persisting in pragmatically felicitous contexts), and (b) disconfirming that negation, as far as behavioral data are concerned, can be used as a reliable linguistic predictor of reading difficulties.


1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven A. Stahl ◽  
T. Gerard Shiel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document