Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on the burden and quality of life of informal caregivers of hemodialysis patients: a systematic review

Author(s):  
Ana Bártolo ◽  
Helena Sousa ◽  
Oscar Ribeiro ◽  
Daniela Figueiredo
2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-714
Author(s):  
Jean-Marc Hurot ◽  
Michel Cucherat ◽  
Margaret Haugh ◽  
Denis Fouque

ABSTRACT. There are many causes for carnitine depletion during maintenance hemodialysis. Supplementation with l-carnitine in animals has been associated with improvement in some abnormalities also present in chronic renal failure. However, it is still controversial whether restoring plasma or tissue carnitine will correct clinical or biologic symptoms observed in maintenance hemodialysis. A systematic review is here performed to determine the effects of l-carnitine in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Eighty-three prospective trials were identified from 1978 to 1999 in which l-carnitine was randomly allocated in 21 trials. Change in serum triglycerides, cholesterol fractions, hemoglobin levels, erythropoietin dose, and other symptoms (muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life) were examined. A total of 482 patients in 18 trials were considered for analysis. There was no effect of l-carnitine on triglycerides, total cholesterol, or any of its fractions. Before the erythropoietin (EPO) era, l-carnitine treatment was associated with improved hemoglobin (P < 0.01) and with a decreased EPO dose (P < 0.01) and improved resistance to EPO when patients routinely received EPO. Muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life could not be reliably assessed because of the noncombinable nature of end points and the limited number of trials. In conclusion, l-carnitine cannot be recommended for treating the dyslipidemia of maintenance hemodialysis patients. By contrast, this review suggests a promising effect of l-carnitine on anemia management. The route of l-carnitine administration should be evaluated because there is no evidence as to the most efficient method of administration in maintenance hemodialysis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 795-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolyn Hersch ◽  
Ilona Juraskova ◽  
Melanie Price ◽  
Barbara Mullan

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna A. Bonenkamp ◽  
Anita van Eck van der Sluijs ◽  
Tiny Hoekstra ◽  
Marianne C. Verhaar ◽  
Frans J. van Ittersum ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 204946372110227
Author(s):  
Toby O. Smith ◽  
Matthew Pearson ◽  
Matthew J Smith ◽  
Jessica Fletcher ◽  
Lisa Irving ◽  
...  

Background: People with chronic pain frequently have difficulties in completing everyday tasks to maintain independence and quality of life. Informal caregivers may provide support to these individuals. However, the effectiveness of interventions to train and support these individuals in caregiving remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the evidence to determine the effectiveness of caregiver interventions to support informal caregivers of people with chronic pain. Methods: A systematic review of published and unpublished literature databases was undertaken (9 April 2021). Trials reporting clinical outcomes of caregiver interventions to train informal caregivers to support community-dwelling people with chronic pain were included. Meta-analysis was undertaken and each outcome was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: Twenty-seven studies were eligible (N = 3427 patients). Twenty-four studies assessed patients with cancer pain and three with musculoskeletal pain. No other patient groups were identified. There was very low-quality evidence that caregiver interventions were beneficial for caregiver health-related quality of life (standardised mean difference = 0.26, 95% confidence interval = 0.01 to 0.52; N = 231). There was moderate-quality evidence that caregiving interventions were effective in reducing pain in the short-term (standardised mean difference = 0.16, 95% confidence interval = −0.29 to −0.03). There was low-quality evidence that caregiving interventions had no beneficial effect over usual care for psychological outcomes, fatigue, coping or physical function in the long-term. Conclusion: Caregiving interventions may be effective for patients and caregivers but only in the shorter-term and for a limited number of outcomes. There is insufficient evidence examining the effectiveness of caregiver interventions for people with non-cancer-related pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document