Curtailed two-stage design for comparing two arms in randomized phase II clinical trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 939-950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Min Chen ◽  
Yunchan Chi ◽  
Hsing-Ming Chang
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1625-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin L. Hand ◽  
John A. Scott ◽  
Phil D. Young ◽  
James D. Stamey ◽  
Dean M. Young

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246448
Author(s):  
Yeonhee Park

The Phase II clinical trials aim to assess the therapeutic efficacy of a new drug. The therapeutic efficacy has been often quantified by response rate such as overall response rate or survival probability in the Phase II setting. However, there is a strong desire to use survival time, which is the gold standard endpoint for the confirmatory Phase III study, when investigators set the primary objective of the Phase II study and test hypotheses based on the median survivals. We propose a method for median event time test to provide the sample size calculation and decision rule of testing. The decision rule is simple and straightforward in that it compares the observed median event time to the identified threshold. Moreover, it is extended to optimal two-stage design for practice, which extends the idea of Simon’s optimal two-stage design for survival endpoint. We investigate the performance of the proposed methods through simulation studies. The proposed methods are applied to redesign a trial based on median event time for trial illustration, and practical strategies are given for application of proposed methods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document