scholarly journals Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 671-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
Afroditi Pina ◽  
G. Tendayi Viki ◽  
Frank Siebler
2006 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Eyssel ◽  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
Frank Siebler

Previous research has shown that information about others’ rape myth acceptance (RMA) affects men’s rape proclivity ( Bohner, Siebler, & Schmelcher, 2006 ). By varying both the level (low vs. high) and format (norm vs. anchor) of such information, different explanations for this effect were investigated. After reporting their own RMA, 117 male participants either read about others’ allegedly low vs. high RMA responses (norm conditions), or estimated if others’ responses were higher or lower than an “arbitrary” low vs. high value (anchor conditions). Later, participants indicated their rape proclivity (RP). Results show that the level of others’ RMA significantly affected participants’ self-reported RP, independent of information format. Furthermore, self-reported RMA and RP were positively correlated. Implications for future research are discussed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
Christopher I. Jarvis ◽  
Friederike Eyssel ◽  
Frank Siebler

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 427-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Chiroro ◽  
Gerd Bohner ◽  
G. Tendayi Viki ◽  
Christopher I. Jarvis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document