<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt; text-align: justify; mso-pagination: none;" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; mso-bidi-font-style: italic;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Historically, mixed evidence has been reported suggesting that mutual fund managers exhibit superior returns based on the length of their tenure.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Further, the result of tenure performance for real estate mutual fund managers has been reported with mixed results.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Therefore, it is the purpose of this research to consider the effect of management tenure on the overall performance of various classes of equity mutual funds, including those funds that invest exclusively in real estate assets. These results are studied over periods of three, five, and ten-year manager tenure to determine if there is significantly better performance among various tenure groups. </span></span></p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>
Sub-Par Performance In A Sub-Prime World? A Recent Comparative Performance Analysis Of Real Estate Mutual Funds Vs. Common Stock Mutual Funds
