Coal mines, carbon budgets and human rights in Australian climate litigation: Reflections on Gloucester Resources Limited v Minister for Planning and Environment

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 244-273
Author(s):  
Julia Dehm
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Bell-James ◽  
Briana Collins

In 2019, the Queensland Parliament enacted a Human Rights Act, enshrining, inter alia, the human right to life. The Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) presents a timely opportunity to open the next chapter in Australia’s climate change litigation history – a human rights-based climate change case. This article will consider the possible characterisation of such a case, drawing on international experience. Ultimately, it will conclude that a rights-based climate change case is feasible in Queensland, and a successful case would have national and international ramifications, due to the potential for Queensland coal deposits to contribute to global climate change. Further, a successful rights-based climate change case in Queensland has the capability to set powerful precedent in the growing body of climate litigation both domestically and internationally, where international climate litigation has been observed as taking a ‘rights turn’.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramesh Kumar Tiwari
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Lacroix ◽  
Jean-Yves Pranchère
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document