Mistaken identity: acute respiratory arrest from accidental ingestion of poison hemlock

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Kai Li ◽  
Hillary Bassett ◽  
Briana Fitch ◽  
Kara Lynch
1991 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1017-1017
Author(s):  
William Gardner
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-519
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Sens ◽  
Sarah E. Meyers ◽  
Mark A. Koponen ◽  
Arne H. Graff ◽  
Ryan D. Reynolds ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 148-151
Author(s):  
Muthhin Almuthhin ◽  
Abdullah Aljahdali ◽  
Mohammad Alzahrani ◽  
Bader Alhusain ◽  
Yousef Algamdi

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Kapsner ◽  
David C. Seaberg ◽  
Charles Stengel ◽  
Kaveh Ilkhanipour ◽  
James Menegazzi

AbstractIntroduction:The esophageal detector device (EDD) recently has been found to assess endotracheal (ET) tube placement accurately. This study describes the reliability of the EDD in determining the position of the ET tube in clinical airway situations that are difficult.Methods:This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled laboratory investigation. Two airway managers (an emergency-medicine attending physician and a resident) determined ET-tube placement using the EDD in five swine in respiratory arrest. The ET tube was placed in the following clinical airway situations: 1) esophagus; 2) esophagus with 1 liter of air instilled; 3) trachea; 4) trachea with 5 ml/kg water instilled; and 5) right mainstem bronchus. Anatomic location of the tube was verified by thoracotomy of the left side of the chest.Results:There was 100% correlation between the resident and attending physician's use of the EDD. The EDD was 100% accurate in determining tube placement in the esophagus, in the esophagus with 1 liter of air instilled, in the trachea, and in the right mainstem bronchus. The airway managers were only 80% accurate in detecting tracheal intubations when fluid was present.Conclusions:The EDD is an accurate and reliable device for detecting ET-tube placement in most clinical situations. Tube placement in fluid-filled trachea, lungs, or both, which occurs in pulmonary edema and drowning, may not be detected using this device.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 2742
Author(s):  
Julia J. Lovin ◽  
Tyler Fick ◽  
Edward Hickey ◽  
M. Regina Lantin-Hermoso
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Danuta Ciesielska ◽  
Krzysztof Ciesielski
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Advait Pandya ◽  
Krishna Kotecha ◽  
Edward Li ◽  
Anthony J. Gill ◽  
Jaswinder S. Samra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Antichthon ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 54-79
Author(s):  
Ronald T. Ridley

AbstractSince the late sixteenth century parts of the ‘imperial frieze’ of the Ara Pacis have been known. The most striking figure in the background of the southern frieze is that long thought to be a portrait of Maecenas, the Etruscan prince and literary patron of the Augustan era. This article attempts three things: to discover 1.Where and how this identification originated,2.What evidence there now is for that identification, and3.What alternative identifications can be offered.The bibliography is substantial, the trail is complicated and highly paradoxical, and fantasy has often played a large role. The ‘evidence’ in play for centuries has sometimes evaporated into thin air. The identities proposed are, in fact, numerous. Not of least interest is the hidden or mistaken identity, in turn, of crucial modern scholars. A method is proposed at last for evaluating the identifications of this background portrait, including obvious comparison with other background figures. This analysis emphasizes how much is still not known about the most famous piece of Augustan art. An attempt is nevertheless made in the last analysis, to support what can be offered, in the light of current understanding, as the most plausible identification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document