Seeing places:The Tempestand the baroque spectacle of the Restoration theatre

Shakespeare ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-186
Author(s):  
Cary DiPietro
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Jenny Davidson

This chapter explores the broad cultural transition from drama to novel during the Restoration period, which triggered one of the most productive periods in the history of the London stage. However, when it comes to the eighteenth century proper, the novel is more likely to be identified as the century's most significant and appealing popular genre. The chapter considers why the novel has largely superseded drama as the literary form to which ambitious and imaginative literary types without a strong affinity for verse writing would by default have turned their attention and energies by the middle of the eighteenth century. Something important may have been lost in the broad cultural transition from drama to novel. This chapter, however, contends that many things were preserved: that the novel was able to absorb many of the functions and techniques not just of Restoration comedy but of the theatre more generally.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Laura J. Rosenthal

This chapter introduces Restoration theatre and Restoration cosmopolitanism, a form of cosmopolitics born out of the newly energized merger of vigorous global ambitions with an intensified striving for sophistication — the convergence, we might say, of the risky and the risqué — and on display on stage. It emerged in the context of two major factors: first, that the monarch and much of the court had spent many years in exile during the civil wars, and second, that during those years they witnessed ways in which the continental monarchs and their courts had enriched themselves through trade, aggression, and plunder in Asia, Africa, and the Americas. The chapter explores Restoration cosmopolitanism as engaged, critiqued, and embodied by the theater, and as a force, like the Enlightenment itself, with profoundly mixed implications. It explains how the book alters standard narratives about Restoration drama by showing how attention to this highly contested cosmopolitanism, which grew out of the period's most intriguing accomplishments and disturbing atrocities, reveals an otherwise elusive consistency among comedy, tragedy, heroic plays, and tragicomedy; disrupts a generally accepted narrative about early capitalism; and offers a fresh perspective on theatrical performances.


1966 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Eugene M. Waith ◽  
John Russell Brown ◽  
Bernard Harris
Keyword(s):  

1967 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-89
Author(s):  
Lucyle Hook
Keyword(s):  

Books Abroad ◽  
1962 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
John P. Cutts ◽  
Robert Etheridge Moore

Early Music ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-516
Author(s):  
DIANA DE MARLY
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-54
Author(s):  
Kevin J. Gardner

“Plays are but the Mirrours of our Lives,” wrote Colley Cibber in 1707, recognizing the special relevance of a timeless metaphor to the theatre of his own day. A man generally given to hyperbole, Cibber here underestimates the theatre's affective power for influencing and transforming society. Of all the many reflections and transformations one may see in the mirror of late-Restoration theatre, however, the most important, I believe, are the images of warfare. In the early eighteenth century, the theatrum mundi was indeed a theatrum belli, for the theatre of war was not confined to Vigo, Blenheim, and Malplaquet, to the fields of Sanders or Spain, but was enacted on the proscenium stages of Drury Lane, Lincoln's Inn fields, and the Haymarket. Nearly every new play written and produced on the London stages in the first decade of the eighteenth century has a Redcoat or a Tar in its dramatis personae or has topical references to the War of the Spanish Succession, to disbandment, to conscription, or to the debate over the issue of a standing army. Concurrent with the theatre's reflection of the nation's concern over the rise of the standing army is a transformation in the representation of army officers in stage comedies. After 1700, portrayals of military men shift so dramatically that they seem to attain an ideological significance; the historical causes and the aesthetic effects of this shift—which are the focal points of the ensuing essay—suggest a widespread ideological effort by writers to enlist public sympathy not only for the soldier but also for the notion of a standing army.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document