scholarly journals Herpes zoster vaccine effectiveness and manifestations of herpes zoster and associated pain by vaccination status

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1157-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Marin ◽  
Barbara P Yawn ◽  
Craig M Hales ◽  
Peter C Wollan ◽  
Stephanie R Bialek ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Hector S Izurieta ◽  
Xiyuan Wu ◽  
Richard Forshee ◽  
Yun Lu ◽  
Heng-Ming Sung ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Shingrix™ (recombinant zoster vaccine) was licensed to prevent herpes zoster, dispensed as two doses given 2–6 months apart, among adults ages ≥50 years. Clinical trials yielded efficacy of >90% for confirmed herpes zoster,but post-market vaccine performance has not been evaluated. Efficacy of a single dose, delayed second dose, or among persons with autoimmune or general immunosuppressive conditions have also not been studied. We aimed to assess post-market vaccine effectiveness of Shingrix. Methods We conducted a cohort study among vaccinated and unvaccinated Medicare Part D community dwelling beneficiaries ages >65 years. Herpes zoster was identified using a medical office visit diagnosis with treatment, and postherpetic neuralgia using a validated algorithm. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to improve cohort balance, and marginal structural models to estimate hazard ratios. Results We found a vaccine effectiveness of 70.1% (95% CI, 68.6–71.5) and 56.9% (95% CI, 55.0–58.8) for two and one doses, respectively. The two-dose vaccine effectiveness was not significantly lower for beneficiaries 80+ years, for second doses received at ≥180 days, or for individuals with autoimmune conditions. The vaccine was also effective among individuals with immunosuppressive conditions. Two-dose vaccine effectiveness against postherpetic neuralgia was 76.0% (95% CI, 68.4-81.8). Conclusions This large real-world observational study of effectiveness of Shingrix demonstrates the benefit of completing the two-dose regimen. Second doses administered beyond the recommended 6 months did not impair vaccine effectiveness.Our effectiveness estimates were lower than the clinical trials estimates, likely due to differences in outcome specificity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung Fu Tseng ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
Craig Hales ◽  
Stephanie R. Bialek ◽  
Rafael Harpaz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yuwei Sun ◽  
Eric Kim ◽  
Christina L Kong ◽  
Benjamin F Arnold ◽  
Travis C Porco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The recombinant zoster vaccine had over 90% efficacy in preventing herpes zoster in clinical trials. However, its effectiveness outside of a clinical trial setting has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine in general practice. Methods A de-identified administrative claims database, the OptumLabs ® Data Warehouse, was used to conduct this retrospective cohort study to assess the effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine against herpes zoster in non-immunocompromised, vaccine age-eligible individuals enrolled in the database for ≥365 days. Results A total of 4 769 819 adults were included in this study, with 173 745 (3.6%) adults receiving two valid doses of the recombinant zoster vaccine. The incidence rate of herpes zoster was 258.8 (95% CI: 230.0 to 289.4) cases per 100 000 person-years in vaccinated persons compared to 893.1 (95% CI: 886.2 to 900.0) in unvaccinated. Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness was 85.5% (95% CI: 83.5% to 87.3%) overall, with an effectiveness of 86.8% (95% CI: 84.6% to 88.7%) in individuals 50 to 79-years-old compared to 80.3% (95% CI: 75.1% to 84.3%) in individuals ages 80 and older. In patients with a history of live zoster vaccine within 5 years of study inclusion, vaccine effectiveness was 84.8% (95% CI: 75.3% to 90.7%). Conclusions Recombinant zoster vaccine effectiveness against herpes zoster was high in a real-world setting. Given the low vaccine coverage and high effectiveness, a major public health effort is needed to identify and address barriers to vaccination and increase immunization rates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Cocchio ◽  
Tolinda Gallo ◽  
Vincenzo Baldo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document