Evaluation of the short-term effects of recovery tools in the rehabilitation of chronic back pain: a feasibility study

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jahan Heidari ◽  
Johanna Belz ◽  
Monika I. Hasenbring ◽  
Jens Kleinert ◽  
Claudia Levenig ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Ling ◽  
Carol Campbell ◽  
Thomas M. Heffernan ◽  
Charles G. Greenough

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Mahnaz Bazzaz-Yamchi ◽  
Soofia Naghdi ◽  
Amin Nakhostin-Ansari ◽  
Monavar Hadizadeh ◽  
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari ◽  
...  

Background. Chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is one of the common health issues. Hamstring tightness contributes to the development of LBP. This study aimed to investigate the acute and short-term effects of deep dry needling (DN) in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP and hamstring muscle tightness. Methods. A single-group pretest-posttest clinical study design was followed. The outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS), passive knee extension (PKE) test, finger-floor distance (FFD) test, and functional rating index (FRI). Patients underwent one session of deep DN of three points on both hamstring muscles, each point for one minute. Patients were assessed before (T0), immediately after (T1), and one week after DN (T2). The FRI was assessed at T0 and T2. Results. Ten women with a mean age of 21.1 years (SD = 1.6) participated in the study. Significant large effect sizes in VAS pain reduction (d = 1.25) and PKE hamstring tightness were obtained (hamstring: right, d = 0.82; left, d = 0.88) at T2. Medium effect sizes were obtained for FFD (d = 0.45) and FRI (d = 0.72) at T2. Conclusion. A single session of deep DN improved pain and function and increased hamstring flexibility. This pilot study supports the use of DN in patients with LBP and hamstring tightness; however, future research with a rigorous study design of randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the findings. This trial is registered with IRCT20180511039612N1.


PM&R ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Velasco-Roldán ◽  
Inmaculada Riquelme ◽  
Alejandro Ferragut-Garcías ◽  
Alberto Marcos Heredia-Rizo ◽  
Cleofás Rodríguez-Blanco ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Kamping ◽  
Maike Müller ◽  
Regine Klinger ◽  
Julia Schmitz ◽  
Herta Flor

Patients’ attitude toward and their personal experience of analgesics may not only influence their expectations about new medications they are prescribed but might also influence placebo effects. We assessed attitudes toward pain medication with an 8-item instrument and experiences with pain medication with an 11-item instrument and evaluated the relationship of attitudes and experiences and placebo responses in chronic back pain patients. On average, patients reported a slightly negative attitude toward analgesics and a slightly positive experience with them compared to healthy pain-free controls that had a more positive attitude toward and experience of analgesics. Pain patients seemed to report their short-term experience with analgesics when completing our instrument, as can be seen by the regression of experience with pain medication and the subscale short-term efficacy of non-/minimally invasive pain medication of the pain interview. Using a pharmacological placebo in a subsample of 38 patients, we were able to show that patients with positive attitudes had a larger placebo response than patients with negative attitudes. The size of the placebo response could be predicted using the mean attitude score. Future placebo research assessing patients’ attitudes toward analgesics seems important and could help to understand the results obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document