Variation in Resource Allocation and Adaptive Strategy of a Wild Rice, Oryza perennis Moench

1982 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 518-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Sano ◽  
Hiroko Morishima

Evolution ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Morishima ◽  
Hiko-Ichi Oka ◽  
Wen-Tsai Chang
Keyword(s):  


2013 ◽  
Vol 726-731 ◽  
pp. 4431-4435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Gao ◽  
Yu Bao Gao ◽  
An Zhi Ren ◽  
Wei Bin Ruan

Trade-off between vegetative growth and reproduction is an important plant adaptive strategy to environmental variability. The study investigated the Stipa grandis resource allocation and the relationship between its sexual reproduction and climate factors among three sites located along a typical environmental gradient in the Inner Mongolian Plateau. The results show that different climatic characteristics among three habitats cause the growth differentiation of S. grandis. S. grandis exhibits a prominent change on the resource allocation patterns. The number of reproductive tillers and panicles biomass allocation are significantly increased along the gradient of water availability and temperature whereas the number of vegetative tillers and root biomass allocation are reduced. The rate of the percentage increase is prominently reduced although the foliage allocation increased. It suggests that under the environments with drought and high temperature, S. grandis allocates more resources to sexual reproduction but reduces the investment in vegetative growth and asexual reproduction. Moreover, the amount of precipitation in April and May are significantly correlated with the sexual reproductive allocation of S. grandis.





Evolution ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiko-Ichi Oka ◽  
Hiroko Morishima


Evolution ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiko-Ichi Oka ◽  
Hiroko Morishima


Evolution ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Morishima ◽  
Hiko-Ichi Oka ◽  
Wen-Tsai Chang
Keyword(s):  


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Malhotra

AbstractAlthough Boyer & Petersen's (B&P's) cataloguing of and evolutionary explanations for folk-economic beliefs is important and valuable, the authors fail to connect their theories to existing explanations for why people do not think like economists. For instance, people often have moral intuitions akin to principles of fairness and justice that conflict with utilitarian approaches to resource allocation.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document