Coordinate transformations for BEAM/EGSnrc Monte Carlo dose calculations of non- coplanar fields received from a DICOM-compliant treatment planning system

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (13) ◽  
pp. 4007-4007 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Thebaut ◽  
S Zavgorodni
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Coordinate Transformations ◽  
Dose Calculations

scholarly journals Dose distribution verification for GZP6 sources: A comparison of Monte Carlo, radiochromic film, and GZP6 treatment planning system

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahreyni Toossi ◽  
Mahdi Ghorbani ◽  
Asghar Mowlavi ◽  
Abdolreza Hashemian ◽  
Soleimani Meigooni
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Radiochromic Film ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Quality Assurance Program ◽  
Monte Carlo Code ◽  
Dose Calculations ◽  
Planning Systems ◽  
Dose Distributions

Background: Treatment planning systems (TPSs) are used for dose calculations in dose delivery by after loading brachytherapy machines. Such planning systems usually use simplified algorithms in their dose calculations. Verification of dose distributions produced by TPS is of clinical importance and is part of a quality assurance program. In this study, the dose distributions generated by GZP6 TPS for two GZP6 sources were verified. Methods: The evaluation was based on the inter comparisons between the isodose curves obtained through Monte Carlo simulations, radiochromic film measurements, and GZP6 treatment planning system. MCNPX Monte Carlo code was used to simulate the sources. Dose measurements were performed in a perspex phantom using Gafchromic? EBT radiochromic films. Comparisons between the results obtained from MC, RCF, and TPS were performed by gamma function calculations with 5% dose/2 mm distance criterion. Results: Based on gamma calculations our results showed that there was good agreement between the dose distributions obtained by the three aforementioned methods in both transverse and longitudinal planes for the GZP6 source No.2. However, for source No. 5, the agreement was good in the transverse plane but it was low in the longitudinal plane. Conclusion: The results showed that dose distributions certified by the GZP6 TPS for the GZP6 source No. 2 were validated. However, for source No. 5 some discrepancies were observed. Accurate knowledge of the activity of each active pellet in the source No. 5 can clarify the cause of the discrepancies.

scholarly journals A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liyong Lin ◽  
Sheng Huang ◽  
Minglei Kang ◽  
Petri Hiltunen ◽  
Reynald Vanderstraeten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Pencil Beam ◽  
Beam Scanning ◽  
Pencil Beam Scanning

scholarly journals Evaluation of a treatment planning system developed for clinical boron neutron capture therapy and validation against an independent Monte Carlo dose calculation system

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naonori Hu ◽  
Hiroki Tanaka ◽  
Ryo Kakino ◽  
Syuushi Yoshikawa ◽  
Mamoru Miyao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Treatment Planning ◽  
Neutron Capture ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Dose Calculation ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Neutron Capture Therapy ◽  
Boron Neutron Capture ◽  
Monte Carlo Dose Calculation

AbstractBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) for the treatment of unresectable, locally advanced, and recurrent carcinoma of the head and neck cancer has been approved by the Japanese government for reimbursement under the national health insurance as of June 2020. A new treatment planning system for clinical BNCT has been developed by Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd. (Sumitomo), NeuCure® Dose Engine. To safely implement this system for clinical use, the simulated neutron flux and gamma ray dose rate inside a water phantom was compared against experimental measurements. Furthermore, to validate and verify the new planning system, the dose distribution inside an anthropomorphic head phantom was compared against a BNCT treatment planning system SERA and an in-house developed Monte Carlo dose calculation program. The simulated results closely matched the experimental results, within 5% for the thermal neutron flux and 10% for the gamma ray dose rate. The dose distribution inside the head phantom closely matched with SERA and the in-house developed dose calculation program, within 3% for the tumour and a difference of 0.3 Gyw for the brain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document