scholarly journals Thomas precession for dressed particles

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 054001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blagoje Oblak
1974 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 503-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene P. Gross

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 30006
Author(s):  
Alexander Kholmetskii ◽  
Oleg Missevitch ◽  
Tolga Yarman ◽  
Metin Arik

1964 ◽  
Vol 19 (13) ◽  
pp. 1447-1451 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ecker ◽  
W. Kröll

We consider a plasma consisting of particle components with different temperatures. The components are uniformly distributed in the configuration space and MAXWELLIAN in the velocity space. Pair correlations are assumed to be small and higher order correlations negligible. It is shown from the BBGKY-hierarchy that the influence of the electrons on the ion kinetics can be taken into account by treating the ions as dressed particles. The hierarchy for these dressed particles provides the ion-ion correlation function. The electron-ion pair correlation is calculated from the POISSON equation using the ion-ion correlation and relating the electron-ion pair distribution to the average potential. By the same procedure we derive the electron-electron correlation making use of the electron-ion correlation. The results are compared with those of other authors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 503-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander L. Kholmetskii ◽  
Tolga Yarman

We continue the analysis of Thomas–Wigner rotation (TWR) and Thomas precession (TP) initiated in (Kholmetskii and Yarman. Can. J. Phys. 92, 1232 (2014). doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0015 ; Kholmetskii et al. Can. J. Phys. 92, 1380 (2014). doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0140 ), where a number of points of serious inconsistency have been found in the relativistic explanation of these effects. These findings motivated us to address covariant ether theories (CET), as suggested by the first author (Kholmetskii. Phys. Scr. 67, 381 (2003)) and to show that both TWR and TP find a perfect explanation in CET. We briefly reproduce the main points of CET, which are constructed on the basis of general symmetries of empty space–time, general relativity principles, and classical causality, instead of Einstein’s postulates of the special theory of relativity (STR). We demonstrate that with respect to all known relativistic experiments performed to date in all areas of physics, both theories, STR and CET, yield identical results. We further show that the only effect that differentiates STR and CET is the measurement of time-dependent TWR of two inertial frames, K1 and K2, related by the rotation-free Lorentz transformation with a third inertial frame, K0, in the situation, where the relative velocity between K1 and K2 remains fixed. We discuss the results obtained and suggest a novel experiment, which can be classified as a new crucial test of STR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document