scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2081 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
State Technical ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Check System ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Submission Date ◽  
The Web

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: To participate in the PIRT-2021 Conference, Participants had to register on the website http://www.pirt.info/?lang=eng#reg_form Abstracts and papers had to be sent to the PIRT-2021 Organizing Committee by e-mail: [email protected] All information about the format of abstracts and papers was on the web-site: http://www.pirt.info/?lang=eng • Number of submissions received: 61 • Number of submissions sent for review: 51 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62,29 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:12 • Any additional info on review process: Plagiarism check system: antiplagiat.ru Authors could resubmit the paper with the necessary revisions. • Contact person for queries: Name : Professor Vladimir Olegovich Gladyshev Affiliation: Head of the Faculty of Fundamental Sciences, Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 5, 2-nd Baumanskaya St., Moscow, 105005, Russian Federation Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All submitted papers will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who are encouraged to give constructive comments and suggestions to the authors. The review is single-blind – the author doesn’t know the names of the reviewers assigned to the review of the paper. The authors of submitted papers will receive the review comments and recommendations and will have a possibility to amend their papers based on the review comments and suggestions and upload the revised versions. If both reviewers indicate that the paper can’t be published then it will not be accepted for publication, however, the talk might be delivered at the Conference if the reviewers specify that in the review. The publication of the papers in the Conference Proceedings is possible only in case the talk is presented at the Conference. • Conference submission management system: - Self-made submission management system • Number of submissions received: Number of full papers submitted for publication in IOP Conference Proceedings - 232 • Number of submissions sent for review: 232 • Number of submissions accepted: 172 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.13% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Anastasia Kaptsova Affiliation:ITMO University, Russia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2064 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box ([email protected]). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Nikolay Zubarev Affiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2062 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Communication Engineering ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will publish the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Easy Chair • Number of submissions received: 97 • Number of submissions sent for review: 73 • Number of submissions accepted: 38 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 39.17% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 51 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Nishu Gupta Affiliation: Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 924 (1) ◽  
pp. 011006
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Agricultural Technology ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Submission Date ◽  
Web Systems

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind The review process was conducted by concealing identities both the reviewer and from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. To facilitate this, the editorial teams ensured that all manuscripts are prepared without the authors’ identity before sending to reviewers. • Conference submission management system: The 5th ICGAB 2021 assisted by Konfrenzi - Web Systems for Scientific Conferences in managing the document submission. • Number of submissions received: 181 • Number of submissions sent for review: 106 • Number of submissions accepted: 90 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 84.9% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 40 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Nimas Mayang Sabrina Sunyoto Affiliation: Faculty of Agricultural Technology, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2119 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Kutateladze Institute ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. Peer review declaration All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) The review process STS-37 papers was conducted by a single-blind process. It is means that only reviewers know the identity of authors, but the authors do not know who is reviewer. • Conference submission management system: All the submission and communication to all the STS-37 authors we did through conference email ([email protected]) • Number of submissions received: 180 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 174 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 96 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 28 • Any additional info on review process: The papers which were recommended by the organizing committee of STS-37 were proposed for reviewing and publication in the volume for STS-37 conference. • Contact person for queries: Name : PhD Cheverda Vyacheslav Vladimirovich Affiliation: Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Email : [email protected].

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 944 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Marine Science ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Review State ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind Answer: We use a double-blind type of peer review process. The author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other. The papers that pass the plagiarism check, then proceed to review process. Review process was conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Our reviewers are the eminent experts, prominent scientists and researchers. We use a double-blind type of peer review process. We provide reviewers an article grading form for each paper. The article grading form contains general comments and also specific suggestions and feedbacks for each section in the paper. The reviewer also asked to make a decision regarding the feasibility of publishing a paper along with the scientific reason behind it, such as substance suitability and data eligibility. Articles will not be processed further, if the results of the review state that the article is not eligible with the reviewer’s notes on the assessment form. We send the paper to the reviewer, for one until two weeks, to be reviewed. Then, we forwarded the results of the review to the author so that it could be improved according to the suggestions and notes of the reviewer. Next, we sent the results of the improvements from the authors back to the reviewers to be followed up, whether they have been well elaborated or still need improvement. When the revised paper still needed some improvement, the steps repeated until the reviewer verified that the article is feasible and ready to be processed to the final stage by the editor (layout and proofread). • Conference submission management system: Answer: All the ICMS 2021 papers were processed by committee email and also by personal message between committees and authors. • Number of submissions received: Answer: 79 • Number of submissions sent for review: Answer: 78 • Number of submissions accepted: Answer: 71 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Answer: 89.9 % • Average number of reviews per paper: Answer: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: Answer: 32 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Answer: All the submitted papers were checked by plagiarism system (Turnitin) to see the plagiarism rate. We only accepted paper that has a plagiarism value below 20%. • Contact person for queries: Answer: Dr. Steven Solikin E-mail: [email protected] Department of Marine Science and Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia Phone: +62 878 8850 3459

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 885 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 89 • Number of submissions sent for review: 87 • Number of submissions accepted: 70 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 11 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review. • Contact persons for queries: Name: Aldar Badmaev, PhD Affiliation: Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS Email: [email protected] Name: Dmitry Popov, PhD Affiliation: Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2101 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Staff Member ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Editorial Staff ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Related Field ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

Abstract On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Double-blind: both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remain anonymous. Each manuscript will be reviewed by at least 2-3 experts in related field: one editorial staff member as well as one to three external reviewers. The review process takes about 1-4 weeks. • Conference submission management system: Through our email system: [email protected], which is in charge by Terasa Lei. • Number of submissions received: 192 • Number of submissions sent for review: 151 (41 papers out of scope or plagiaristic were rejected directly after received) • Number of submissions accepted: 88 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 45.8% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 114 • Any additional info on review process: While receiving a new submission, we/our editors firstly check the scope of it whether suitable for our conference. If not, it will be rejected directly. If yes, it will be sent out to check plagiarism and then peer review. We choose 2 reviewers for each of the submission and after getting the two reviews, we conclude a final result for the paper. Once the two reviews show totally different attitudes, we will find another reviewer for it until we get the final result. • Contact person for queries: Name : Terasa Lei Affiliation: Hubei Zhongke Institute of Geology and Environment Technology Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 923 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Agricultural Science ◽  
Scientific Creativity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) • The peer review of all research at the Second International Conference for Agricultural Science (ICFAS 2021) was double-blind, and every reviewer responsible for two research. • Conference submission management system: • A temporary account was used in the open conference system (OCS), for pkp company with help from University of Al-Muthanna. • Number of submissions received: 122 submissions received • Number of submissions sent for review: only 90 research sent for reviewers because 32 research did not comply with the conference instructions in terms of scientific creativity or scientific plagrisim less than 20%. • Number of submissions accepted: 90 research was accepted only. • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): Acceptance Rate equal (73.77 %) • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews for each paper. • Total number of reviewers involved: 45 reviewers. • Any additional info on review process: The reviewers do not know the names of the authors, and the authors do not know who reviewed their manuscript. Contact person for queries: Name : Dr. Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed Affiliation: University of Al-Qadisiyah Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2080 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Green Technology ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) • Conference submission management system: Google Drive: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSddb-Z5gjUh3mRRLV0voq9jtoy-SxJV7-n9Wdpb5c1WVDlUag/viewform • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 34 • Number of submissions accepted: 32 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 34/38 X 100: 84.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 • Any additional info on the review process:- • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Nazeri Affiliation: Center of Excellence Geopolymer & Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia Email : [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document