scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2116 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Committee ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Theme ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-anonymous, i.e., authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors. • Criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. The papers were reviewed based on their relevance to the conference theme, originality, organization, clarity, quality of figures and tables, language and conformity to author’s guidelines. If the overall recommendation was acceptance with either minor or major changes, the authors were able to submit a revised version addressing the comments raised in the review process. • Conference submission management system: Emma events management system. • Number of submissions received: 141 • Number of submissions sent for review: 141 • Number of submissions accepted: 130 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 92.2% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved: 25 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): The papers were reviewed by members of the local organizing committee and international scientific committee • Contact person for queries: Prof. Pedro J. Coelho ([email protected])

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2090 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • Conference submission management system: IDAS Conference management System • Number of submissions received: 336 • Number of submissions sent for review: 315 • Number of submissions accepted: 189 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.25% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: more than 600 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): We use Turnitin system for plagiarism checking • Contact person for queries: Dimitrios Vlachos Associate Professor, University of Peloponnese Email: [email protected] Tel: +30 6944 371526

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2088 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Committee ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Engineering Institute

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The system developed in the information and computing centre of NRU MPEI ([email protected]). All the files and information necessary for registration are uploaded to the conference website, after which the report is assigned a registration number that is used to identify the article • Number of submissions received: 71 • Number of submissions sent for review: 71 • Number of submissions accepted: 56 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 69,6 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.126 • Total number of reviewers involved: 152 • Any additional info on review process: The reviewers were members of the scientific committee and scientists (foreign and domestic) who are experts in each of the presented topics • Contact person for queries: Name : Pyatnitskaya Natalia Affiliation: National Research Univercity Moscow Power Engineering Institute Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 748 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Yes for accepting papers but no for declining papers. • Conference submission management system: Edas System (https://edas.info/27558 or https://acifas2020.edas.info/) • Number of submissions received: 122 • Number of submissions sent for review: 98 • Number of submissions accepted: 44 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 44.89 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 65 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): Yes, we used the application embedded with Edas system and Turninithin application for final check. • Contact person for queries: Arjon Turnip Universitas Padjadjaran [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 888 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via email [email protected], managed by Indri Juliyarsi, Robi Amizar, Sri Melia, and Ade Sukma • Number of submissions received: 162 • Number of submissions sent for review: 113 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52,47 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 • Any additional info on review process: proofread and turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name: Dr. Indri Juliyarsi Affiliation: Universitas Andalas Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: we develop our submission system where the editors, the authors and the reviewers can access using their unique login password. • Number of submissions received: 311 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 241 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 81 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Supari Affiliation : Center for Climate Change Informastion, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2077 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Technical University ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: - • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 38 • Number of submissions accepted: 25 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 65,8 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 23 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Pozdeeva Ekaterina Affiliation: Engineer, State Marine Technical University, St.-Petersburg Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2053 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) - All the review process was done single-blind through Microsoft CMT platform. Average three reviewers involved for each paper. In the CMT system, we provide each reviewer with a Review Questions form. • Conference submission management system: - Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 36 • Number of submissions sent for review: 36 • Number of submissions accepted: 26 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 72.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 53 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Shamsul Sarip Affiliation: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 926 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Minor Revision ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Table 1 shows the evaluation aspects in the review process at The 3rd ICoGEE 2021. Several essential things in scientific articles are reviewed through this evaluation aspect, such as novelty, originality, clarity of methods and analysis, and their significance in science and technology. If an evaluation aspect has less than good quality, the reviewer provides suggestions for improvement, and the author must improve it or provide feedback. The reviewer will also offer recommendations such as: (i) accept without revision (if all aspects of the evaluation have exceptional score), (ii) accept with minor revision (if there are less than two evaluation aspects whose quality is below good), (iii) accept with major revision (if there are about 2 - 4 evaluation aspects that are below good quality), and (iv) reject (if more than four evaluation aspects have below good quality or are considered not to meet the essential requirements of scientific articles). • Conference submission management system: For official The 3rd ICoGEE 2021 webpage, we used: http://icogee.org, while for paper management system, we used Easy Chair: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icogee2021 • Number of submissions received: 197 • Number of submissions sent for review: 197 • Number of submissions accepted: 114 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 57,86% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 41 • Any additional info on review process: All papers had undergone plagiarism check (using Turnitin) and single-blind review by two reviewers • Contact person for queries: Name : Yuant Tiandho Affiliation : Department of Physics, Universitas Bangka Belitung Email : [email protected] / [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 883 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Similarity Index ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Scientific Committee ◽  
High Similarity ◽  
Minor Revision ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: a. All papers submitted were checked their similarity index using Turnitin. b. Papers have similarity index more than 25% were rejected. c. After that, the format of the papers was checked. Papers that did not follow the IOP template will be sent back to the authors for revision. d. All papers passed the similarity index and have already follow the IOP template will be sent to the reviewers. e. Reviewers reviewed the papers and give comments to the papers. f. Scientific committee decided if the papers: accepted, accepted with major revision, accepted with minor revision, or rejected. g. Author revised their papers and send back their revision • Conference submission management system: All papers from the conference submitted to using JOTForm Submission System • Number of submissions received: 143 Submission were received • Number of submissions sent for review: 143 Submission was sent for review, and the rest was rejected because out of scope, low-quality articles and high similarity • Number of submissions accepted: 100 Paper accepted based on IOP EES Scope and quality • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (100/143) × 100 = 69.93 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Times • Total number of reviewers involved: 21 Reviewer Involved + 4 Editors • Any additional info on review process: NONE • Contact person for queries: Dr. Esther Kembauw, SP., M.Si Pattimura University Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 936 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Check System ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Some criteria when accepting/declining paper were including: (1). The depth of the research methods and results, (2). Whether the papers were written properly, (3). If the topics of the research matches our conference, (4). All the figures were correlated to the discussion. Time given to authors in resubmitting after revisions was approximately 1 month. • Conference submission management system: We use Easychair.org platform in managing our conference submission. Submissions were available for 2.5 months prior to conference date. We generally accepted all the papers submitted for presentation in the conference as long as they suit the theme. After conference, the review process was conducted by Reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 53 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 43 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 85% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): • Contact person for queries: Mohammad Rohmaneo Darminto [email protected]/[email protected] Laboratory of Geoinformatics Department of Geomatics Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document