scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 936 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Check System ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s) Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Some criteria when accepting/declining paper were including: (1). The depth of the research methods and results, (2). Whether the papers were written properly, (3). If the topics of the research matches our conference, (4). All the figures were correlated to the discussion. Time given to authors in resubmitting after revisions was approximately 1 month. • Conference submission management system: We use Easychair.org platform in managing our conference submission. Submissions were available for 2.5 months prior to conference date. We generally accepted all the papers submitted for presentation in the conference as long as they suit the theme. After conference, the review process was conducted by Reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 53 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 53 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 43 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 85% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): • Contact person for queries: Mohammad Rohmaneo Darminto [email protected]/[email protected] Laboratory of Geoinformatics Department of Geomatics Engineering Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember Surabaya Indonesia Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2090 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Associate Professor ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Check System ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? • Conference submission management system: IDAS Conference management System • Number of submissions received: 336 • Number of submissions sent for review: 315 • Number of submissions accepted: 189 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 56.25% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: more than 600 • Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): We use Turnitin system for plagiarism checking • Contact person for queries: Dimitrios Vlachos Associate Professor, University of Peloponnese Email: [email protected] Tel: +30 6944 371526

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance

2021 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Conference Proceedings ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All submitted papers will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who are encouraged to give constructive comments and suggestions to the authors. The review is single-blind – the author doesn’t know the names of the reviewers assigned to the review of the paper. The authors of submitted papers will receive the review comments and recommendations and will have a possibility to amend their papers based on the review comments and suggestions and upload the revised versions. If both reviewers indicate that the paper can’t be published then it will not be accepted for publication, however, the talk might be delivered at the Conference if the reviewers specify that in the review. The publication of the papers in the Conference Proceedings is possible only in case the talk is presented at the Conference. • Conference submission management system: - Self-made submission management system • Number of submissions received: Number of full papers submitted for publication in IOP Conference Proceedings - 232 • Number of submissions sent for review: 232 • Number of submissions accepted: 172 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.13% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Anastasia Kaptsova Affiliation:ITMO University, Russia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 911 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Online Submission ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (We adopt this system to allow the reviewers to know who the authors are, but the author do not know who the reviewers are) • Conference submission management system: Via online submission through ICFST official website as follow: https://icfst2021.com/submit-paper/ • Number of submissions received: 114 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 114 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 89 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Accepted: 78 %, Rejected : 22% • Average number of reviews per paper: 10-12 papers per reviewer • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Review started on August to September 2021 • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Aqil Affiliation: Indonesian Cereals Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Indonesia Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2080 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Green Technology ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

Peer Review Declaration Form Guidance On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) • Conference submission management system: Google Drive: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSddb-Z5gjUh3mRRLV0voq9jtoy-SxJV7-n9Wdpb5c1WVDlUag/viewform • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 34 • Number of submissions accepted: 32 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 34/38 X 100: 84.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 • Any additional info on the review process:- • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Muhammad Firdaus Mohd Nazeri Affiliation: Center of Excellence Geopolymer & Green Technology (CEGeoGTech), Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2097 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) Double-blind: While receiving a new submission, we/our editors firstly check the scope of it whether suitable for our conference. If not, it will be rejected directly. If yes, it will be sent out to check plagiarism and then peer review. We choose 2 reviewers for each of the submission and after getting the two reviews, we conclude a final result for the paper. Once the two reviews show totally different attitudes, we will find another reviewer for it until we get the final result. • Conference submission management system: Through our email system Email: [email protected] In charge: Terasa Lei • Number of submissions received: 58 • Number of submissions sent for review: 49 (papers out of topic or plagiaristic were rejected directly) • Number of submissions accepted: 28 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 48.28% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2-3 • Total number of reviewers involved: About 35 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Terasa Lei Affiliation: Hubei Zhongke Institute of Geology and Environment Technology Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2073 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Editorial Committee ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single blind • Conference submission management system: By email received from the organizing and editorial committee of the conference. The correspondence authors make the submission by email. • Number of submissions received: 32 • Number of submissions sent for review: 32 • Number of submissions accepted: 20 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62.5% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Any additional info on review process: All papers are plagiarism checked by Turnitin software • Contact person for queries: Ely Dannier V. Niño Foundation of Researchers in Science and Technology of Materials (FORISTOM) Email: [email protected] Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1199 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Review Form ◽  
Single Blind ◽  
Submission Date

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe) MMS 2021 review form If you cannot review this manuscript within 2 weeks, please return it immediately without comments. If you answer on any question "No, see comments" fill your comment at the end of review form. Thank you for your assistance! 1. Is the topic of the manuscript relevant, timely and of interest to the audience of this conference?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 2. Does the title of the article accurately reflect its content?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 3. Is the research methodology and treatment of the study appropriate and applied properly?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 4. Is the length of the paper appropriate to the content?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 5. Do the used notation and nomenclature meet the standards determined in the area of paper interest?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 6. Is this paper clearly and concisely written and well organized?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 7. Does the manuscript contain sufficient and appropriate references?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 8. Are tables and figures appropriate and adequate?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 9. Does the abstract of article satisfactorily show the aims, methods and result of the article?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 10. Does the conclusion clearly summarize the main results and contributions of the manuscript?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 11. Is the language and presentation clear to readers familiar with the field?* ○ Yes ○ No, see comments 12. Comments: • Conference submission management system: https://www.mmsconf.eu/index.php/mms/mms2021 Open Conference System https://pkp.sfu.ca/ocs/ • Number of submissions received: 143 • Number of submissions sent for review: 130 • Number of submissions accepted: 105 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): (105/143)x100=73% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 70 • Any additional info on review process:- • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Eng. MSc. Lucia Knapčíková, Ph.D. Email: [email protected] Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement. The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 888 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via email [email protected], managed by Indri Juliyarsi, Robi Amizar, Sri Melia, and Ade Sukma • Number of submissions received: 162 • Number of submissions sent for review: 113 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52,47 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 • Any additional info on review process: proofread and turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name: Dr. Indri Juliyarsi Affiliation: Universitas Andalas Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2053 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Conference Management ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) - All the review process was done single-blind through Microsoft CMT platform. Average three reviewers involved for each paper. In the CMT system, we provide each reviewer with a Review Questions form. • Conference submission management system: - Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 36 • Number of submissions sent for review: 36 • Number of submissions accepted: 26 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 72.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 53 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Shamsul Sarip Affiliation: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email :[email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 926 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Blind Review ◽  
Minor Revision ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Table 1 shows the evaluation aspects in the review process at The 3rd ICoGEE 2021. Several essential things in scientific articles are reviewed through this evaluation aspect, such as novelty, originality, clarity of methods and analysis, and their significance in science and technology. If an evaluation aspect has less than good quality, the reviewer provides suggestions for improvement, and the author must improve it or provide feedback. The reviewer will also offer recommendations such as: (i) accept without revision (if all aspects of the evaluation have exceptional score), (ii) accept with minor revision (if there are less than two evaluation aspects whose quality is below good), (iii) accept with major revision (if there are about 2 - 4 evaluation aspects that are below good quality), and (iv) reject (if more than four evaluation aspects have below good quality or are considered not to meet the essential requirements of scientific articles). • Conference submission management system: For official The 3rd ICoGEE 2021 webpage, we used: http://icogee.org, while for paper management system, we used Easy Chair: https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=icogee2021 • Number of submissions received: 197 • Number of submissions sent for review: 197 • Number of submissions accepted: 114 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 57,86% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 41 • Any additional info on review process: All papers had undergone plagiarism check (using Turnitin) and single-blind review by two reviewers • Contact person for queries: Name : Yuant Tiandho Affiliation : Department of Physics, Universitas Bangka Belitung Email : [email protected] / [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document