scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 928 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Siberian Research Institute ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: https://peatlands2021.ru/ • Number of submissions received: 18 • Number of submissions sent for review: 18 • Number of submissions accepted:15 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 83% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:6 • Any additional info on review process: The abstracts were submitted by the online system which is available on the conference page https://peatlands2021.ru/. Uploading of full paper may only be done by participants who attend and present their research activities during the conference. The submitted full papers are then collected by the committee for review regarding the format, language and suitability of the conference scope. The papers were sent to 2 reviewers according to topic of the papers and reviewer’s competency. Reviewer was given around 2 weeks to conduct review of the paper for publication in IOP Conference Series. Authors have 2-3 weeks to resubmit an updated version of their submissions with the necessary changes for further evaluation, which should follow the comments and suggestions from our reviewers. Only those submissions passed the peer review and accepted by the reviewers and editors will be included in the conference proceeding finally. • Contact person for queries: Name: Kharanzhevskaya Yu. A. Affiliation: Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of Agro-BioTechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture and Peat, Tomsk, 3 Gagarin st., 634050, Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 885 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 89 • Number of submissions sent for review: 87 • Number of submissions accepted: 70 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 11 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review. • Contact persons for queries: Name: Aldar Badmaev, PhD Affiliation: Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS Email: [email protected] Name: Dmitry Popov, PhD Affiliation: Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 929 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Research Station ◽  
Executive Editor ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via e-mail [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 39 • Number of submissions sent for review: 39 • Number of submissions accepted: 34 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 87.2 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 • Any additional info on review process: The review process was organized by the next way: ➢ All the participants who presented their reports on Symposium sections (virtually, via Zoom) were invited to submit their papers to be published in “IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science”. ➢ Submission of papers was carried out by the Organizing Committee’s e-mail [email protected]. ➢ The secretary of the Organizing Committee made all the materials formal verification and redirected the needed quality submissions to corresponding editors with respect to six thematic sections (one executive editor for each section). ➢ The section executive editor provided at least two reviews for each paper from his section. The reviewers were selected from the list of high quality experts who are world-known specialists in geology, geophysics and geoecology from Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. ➢ With respect to review results all the submissions were divided into three groups: 1) The manuscript is recommended for publication 2) The manuscript is recommended for publication after revision (for these type of submissions the revision process was continued by communication between authors and reviewers via the executive editor in hidden form) 3) The manuscript is not recommended for publication ➢ The final step of papers preparation was related to accepted submissions verification with respect to the IOP:EES format requirements; checking of scientific style and the English language spelling and punctuation correctness. • Contact person for queries: Name: Olga Zabinyakova Affiliation: Research station of Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek city, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer-Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 869 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Preliminary Review ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Number of submissions received: 94 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 94 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 74 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 papers • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: 1. Preliminary review 2. The papers passed the first review will be reviewed again from the following aspects: originality, innovation, technical soundness, and applicability Ilham Zulfahmi Email: [email protected] Universitas Syiah Kuala

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: we develop our submission system where the editors, the authors and the reviewers can access using their unique login password. • Number of submissions received: 311 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 241 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 81 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Supari Affiliation : Center for Climate Change Informastion, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 855 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Insight-https://insight.klinkhamergroup.com/crossingboundariesconference/account/closed • Number of submissions received: 42 • Number of submissions sent for review: 42 • Number of submissions accepted: 34 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 55 • Any additional info on review process: n/a • Contact person for queries: Name : Nadia Debie Affiliation: Klinkhamer Group Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2064 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box ([email protected]). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Nikolay Zubarev Affiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 944 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Marine Science ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Review State ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind Answer: We use a double-blind type of peer review process. The author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other. The papers that pass the plagiarism check, then proceed to review process. Review process was conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Our reviewers are the eminent experts, prominent scientists and researchers. We use a double-blind type of peer review process. We provide reviewers an article grading form for each paper. The article grading form contains general comments and also specific suggestions and feedbacks for each section in the paper. The reviewer also asked to make a decision regarding the feasibility of publishing a paper along with the scientific reason behind it, such as substance suitability and data eligibility. Articles will not be processed further, if the results of the review state that the article is not eligible with the reviewer’s notes on the assessment form. We send the paper to the reviewer, for one until two weeks, to be reviewed. Then, we forwarded the results of the review to the author so that it could be improved according to the suggestions and notes of the reviewer. Next, we sent the results of the improvements from the authors back to the reviewers to be followed up, whether they have been well elaborated or still need improvement. When the revised paper still needed some improvement, the steps repeated until the reviewer verified that the article is feasible and ready to be processed to the final stage by the editor (layout and proofread). • Conference submission management system: Answer: All the ICMS 2021 papers were processed by committee email and also by personal message between committees and authors. • Number of submissions received: Answer: 79 • Number of submissions sent for review: Answer: 78 • Number of submissions accepted: Answer: 71 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): Answer: 89.9 % • Average number of reviews per paper: Answer: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: Answer: 32 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Answer: All the submitted papers were checked by plagiarism system (Turnitin) to see the plagiarism rate. We only accepted paper that has a plagiarism value below 20%. • Contact person for queries: Answer: Dr. Steven Solikin E-mail: [email protected] Department of Marine Science and Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia Phone: +62 878 8850 3459

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 908 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 63 • Number of submissions accepted: 42 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 19 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Contact person for queries: Name : Oleg A. Anenkhonov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 843 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Federal Research ◽  
Scientific Experts ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via e-mail [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 98 • Number of submissions sent for review: 84 • Number of submissions accepted: 65 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 66.3% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 24 • Any additional info on review process: All reviewers have academic status and are recognized scientific experts in their field. Contact person for queries: Name : Fomin Sergey Denisovich, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Head of the NAMSI Center, Doctor of Technical Sciences Affiliation: Volgograd State Agrarian University, FEDERAL RESEARCH CENTER” NEMCHINOVKA " Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 906 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Editorial Office ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
On Line ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind. All articles (228) had not been sent to the reviewers when they were submitted, and the review process had been completed in 2 rounds. In the 1st round, the articles were evaluated by means of their originality and suitability. These selected 174 articles were taken under consideration and sent to the reviewers. • Conference submission management system: On-line submission system of WMESS was used for the submission of the articles. However, the review process was managed by sending the articles to the reviewers by e-mail accounts of the editorial office ([email protected]). The chairmen (Prof. Dr. Marian Marschalko, Prof. Dr. Isik Yilmaz, Prof. Dr. Marian Drusa) were responsible for the review process. • Number of submissions received: 228 • Number of submissions sent for review: 174 • Number of submissions accepted: 138 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 61% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 86 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Marian Marschalko ([email protected]) Isik Yilmaz ([email protected])

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document