scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 929 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Research Station ◽  
Executive Editor ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via e-mail [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 39 • Number of submissions sent for review: 39 • Number of submissions accepted: 34 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 87.2 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 37 • Any additional info on review process: The review process was organized by the next way: ➢ All the participants who presented their reports on Symposium sections (virtually, via Zoom) were invited to submit their papers to be published in “IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science”. ➢ Submission of papers was carried out by the Organizing Committee’s e-mail [email protected]. ➢ The secretary of the Organizing Committee made all the materials formal verification and redirected the needed quality submissions to corresponding editors with respect to six thematic sections (one executive editor for each section). ➢ The section executive editor provided at least two reviews for each paper from his section. The reviewers were selected from the list of high quality experts who are world-known specialists in geology, geophysics and geoecology from Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. ➢ With respect to review results all the submissions were divided into three groups: 1) The manuscript is recommended for publication 2) The manuscript is recommended for publication after revision (for these type of submissions the revision process was continued by communication between authors and reviewers via the executive editor in hidden form) 3) The manuscript is not recommended for publication ➢ The final step of papers preparation was related to accepted submissions verification with respect to the IOP:EES format requirements; checking of scientific style and the English language spelling and punctuation correctness. • Contact person for queries: Name: Olga Zabinyakova Affiliation: Research station of Russian Academy of Sciences in Bishkek city, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 928 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Siberian Research Institute ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science has been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: https://peatlands2021.ru/ • Number of submissions received: 18 • Number of submissions sent for review: 18 • Number of submissions accepted:15 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 83% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:6 • Any additional info on review process: The abstracts were submitted by the online system which is available on the conference page https://peatlands2021.ru/. Uploading of full paper may only be done by participants who attend and present their research activities during the conference. The submitted full papers are then collected by the committee for review regarding the format, language and suitability of the conference scope. The papers were sent to 2 reviewers according to topic of the papers and reviewer’s competency. Reviewer was given around 2 weeks to conduct review of the paper for publication in IOP Conference Series. Authors have 2-3 weeks to resubmit an updated version of their submissions with the necessary changes for further evaluation, which should follow the comments and suggestions from our reviewers. Only those submissions passed the peer review and accepted by the reviewers and editors will be included in the conference proceeding finally. • Contact person for queries: Name: Kharanzhevskaya Yu. A. Affiliation: Siberian Federal Scientific Centre of Agro-BioTechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Research Institute of Agriculture and Peat, Tomsk, 3 Gagarin st., 634050, Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 908 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 63 • Number of submissions accepted: 42 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 19 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Contact person for queries: Name : Oleg A. Anenkhonov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 885 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Nature Management ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 89 • Number of submissions sent for review: 87 • Number of submissions accepted: 70 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 11 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review. • Contact persons for queries: Name: Aldar Badmaev, PhD Affiliation: Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS Email: [email protected] Name: Dmitry Popov, PhD Affiliation: Baikal Institute of Nature Management SB RAS Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer Review Declaration

2022 ◽  
Vol 962 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
English Language ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
New Information ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Made In

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 120 • Number of submissions sent for review: 120 • Number of submissions accepted: 63 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received × 100): 53 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 • Any additional info on the review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Review criteria for manuscripts When reviewing articles, 20 criteria were used. 1 criterion “COMPLIANCE WITH COLLECTION PROFILE”. According to this criterion, it fully corresponded to the profile of the collection of 51 articles, partially corresponded to the profile of the collection – 11, did not correspond to – 57. Thus, according to the first criterion, 57 articles were rejected, 11 were sent for revision, returned from revision and accepted after repeated review 11. Total in the final version of the collection adopted 63 articles. 2 criterion “RECOMMENDED HEADING FOR PUBLICATION”. According to this criterion, the recommended headings were refined in 5 articles, which were accepted after rereview. 3 criterion “PRESENCE OF PLAGIUM” (including auto-plagiarism). There were no rejected articles for this criterion. 4 criterion “CONTENTS”. Rejected for reason - article contains no new information – 17 articles. 5 criterion “TITLE”. According to this criterion, the authors of 3 articles were asked to change the title of the articles. After re-reviewing, these articles were accepted for publication. 6 criterion “ANNOTATION”. Changes have been made to 9 articles. The changes concerned the reduction of the annotation, as its dimensions did not meet the requirements. 7 criterion “INTRODUCTION”. On the recommendation of the editors, changes were made to 7 articles. 8 criterion “METHODS”. According to this criterion, 5 articles were sent for revision. The main reason for the revision was the lack of links to similar foreign articles. 9 criterion “EXPERIMENTAL DATA”. There were no rejected articles for this criterion. 10 criterion “STATISTICAL DATA PROCESSING”. There were no rejected articles for this criterion. 11 criterion “ILLUSTRATIONS AND SIGNATURES”. According to this criterion, it was recommended that 36 authors improve their articles. Basically, all recommendations are technical in nature. Of these, 31 articles were returned for re-review and recommended for publication. 12 criterion “TABLES AND THEIR HEADINGS”. Editors’ comments were of a technical nature. According to the publication requirements, 29 articles were sent for revision. All of them were adopted after the changes made by the authors. 13 criterion “DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS”. 6 articles were rejected, which were insufficiently substantiated and contained only a listing of the facts obtained. 14 criterion “STYLE OF PRESENTATION”. There were no rejected articles for this criterion. 15 criterion “REFERENCES”. According to this criterion, technical corrections were made in 41 articles, which were accepted after revision by the authors. 16 criterion “LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS”. There were no rejected articles for this criterion. 17 criterion “QUALITY SUMMARY”. There were no rejected articles for this criterion. 18 criterion “THE QUALITY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE OF THE WHOLE TEXT OF THE ARTICLE”. According to this criterion, 5 articles were rejected as the presentation in English was unsatisfactory. The article could not be accepted for publication. 24 articles contained grammatical and stylistic errors in the English version. The authors of these articles were encouraged to correct the corresponding inaccuracies. After the changes were made, 24 articles were accepted for publication. 19 and 20 criteria “CONCLUSION” and “OVERALL PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT”. According to this criterion, 63 articles were recommended for publication by the editors. Of these, 41 articles were required to be revised. The editors rejected 57 articles. Contact person for queries: Name: Oleg V. Korsun, Ph. D. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology SB RAS Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer-Review Declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 869 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Preliminary Review ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Number of submissions received: 94 papers • Number of submissions sent for review: 94 papers • Number of submissions accepted: 74 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78.72% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 papers • Total number of reviewers involved: 31 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: 1. Preliminary review 2. The papers passed the first review will be reviewed again from the following aspects: originality, innovation, technical soundness, and applicability Ilham Zulfahmi Email: [email protected] Universitas Syiah Kuala

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 888 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: via email [email protected], managed by Indri Juliyarsi, Robi Amizar, Sri Melia, and Ade Sukma • Number of submissions received: 162 • Number of submissions sent for review: 113 • Number of submissions accepted: 85 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 52,47 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 • Any additional info on review process: proofread and turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name: Dr. Indri Juliyarsi Affiliation: Universitas Andalas Email: [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: we develop our submission system where the editors, the authors and the reviewers can access using their unique login password. • Number of submissions received: 311 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 241 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 81 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Supari Affiliation : Center for Climate Change Informastion, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Email : [email protected]; [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 855 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Environmental Science ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
Scientific Standards

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Insight-https://insight.klinkhamergroup.com/crossingboundariesconference/account/closed • Number of submissions received: 42 • Number of submissions sent for review: 42 • Number of submissions accepted: 34 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 55 • Any additional info on review process: n/a • Contact person for queries: Name : Nadia Debie Affiliation: Klinkhamer Group Email : [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2064 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Conference Series ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box ([email protected]). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Nikolay Zubarev Affiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected]

scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 2100 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
High Temperatures ◽  
Management System ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Contact Person ◽  
Academy Of Sciences ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Scientific Standards ◽  
Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Authors submitted abstract and papers using the conference website. • Number of submissions received: 57 • Number of submissions sent for review: 33 • Number of submissions accepted: 33 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:38 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper was considered by 2 reviewers at least. Most of the papers had been sent for revision and some of them for revision more than once. • Contact person for queries: Name : Valentin Bityurin, e-mail: Affiliation: Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences (JIHT RAS) Email : [email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document