scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 1206 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other All papers have been reviewed by at least two reviewers and follow a double-blind peer review process. For the peer review, an editor has been assigned to the submitted paper as per the major theme of the conference, i.e., design engineering, thermal engineering and fluid science, material science and nanomaterials, production and industrial engineering. Four editors have been handling the review process by assigning two domain expert reviewers to each paper. The papers have been evaluated as per the quality criteria of IOP Publishing and the decisions were sent to the authors, such as: strong accept, accept, weak accept, borderline paper, and reject. The weakly accepted and borderline papers were sent back to authors for revision and resubmission was done through EasyChair. The resubmitted paper was again evaluated by the editor, and a final decision has been conveyed to the author. • Conference submission management system: Easychair Easychair was chosen as the conference paper submission and review management system for ICRAMEN 2021. All papers have been submitted and also reviewed by the Easychair account only. A revised submission was also accepted only by the easychair account. All email correspondence with the author was done through easychair email and also from [email protected]. • Number of submissions received: 52 We have received a total of 52 papers, out of which accepted and registered papers have been considered for presentation at the conference and publication in a journal. • Number of submissions sent for review: 50 Two papers were not considered for review due to late submission and was rejected by the editor. • Number of submissions accepted: 28 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 54% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 23 • Any additional info on review process: 1. The Plagiarism Checker X software has been used to check the similarity index of the papers. The similarity index of all the papers is not more than 20%. 2. ICRAMEN 2021 was a virtual conference, with all presentations delivered via the Zoom online platform. 3. All papers have been evaluated by the editor and reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers. Also, some papers are sent back to the author for further revision after the presentation at the conference to amend the corrections suggested by the session chair. • Contact person for queries: Dr. Manoj A. Kumbhalkar, Conference Chair, ICRAMEN 2021. President, Research Association of Masters of Engineering (RAME), India. [email protected], [email protected]

2021 ◽  
Vol 913 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: The peer review process was conducted with double-blind method by 2 reviewers per article. • Conference submission management system: Email address used for manuscript management system is [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 180 • Number of submissions sent for review: 125 • Number of submissions accepted: 111 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 61.67% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 rounds of review process • Total number of reviewers involved: 12 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: In detail, the submitted papers were checked for their plagiarism similarity index with Turn it in software. Any manuscript with similarity index above 25% will be returned to the author for revision. The peer-review process was conducted by involving internal reviewers from University of Mataram who has scopus H-index ≥ 3. In addition, external reviewers were also involved from other universities and institution. Selection of the reviewers was conducted based on the suitability of the reviewer expertise and the subtopic of the paper. The first decision whether the paper is rejected or required for revision is sent in approximately 4 days. The comments from the reviewer are concluded by the editor in chief to reject or accept the paper. • Contact person for queries: Eka Sunarwidhi Prasedya, Ph.D. University of Mataram, Mataram, Indonesia [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2083 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: https://editorone.org/conferences/5fd6b50f5187a?conf=ICAPC2021 The email address used for the management system and the name of the person in charge as follows Affiliation: Guilin Normal College Email: [email protected] Name: Zhiyong Shao • Number of submissions received: 591 • Number of submissions sent for review: 498 • Number of submissions accepted: 369 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 62% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 125 • Any additional info on review process: Step 1. Selected papers divided into several parts according to their topics. Step 2. Authors names, affiliations and email addresses removed from papers. Step 3. Papers sent to the reviewers who are professional in the related area for peer review. Step 4. Papers sent back to the writer if two reviewers reject the same paper, papers sent for publication if two reviewers accept the same paper, and if two reviewers disagree on the same paper, the paper will be sent to the chief editor for final decision. Step 5. Authors revise their paper according to the reviewers’ comments. • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) Name: Zhiyong Shao Affiliation: Guilin Normal College Email: [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: we develop our submission system where the editors, the authors and the reviewers can access using their unique login password. • Number of submissions received: 311 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 241 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 81 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Supari Affiliation : Center for Climate Change Informastion, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Email : [email protected]; [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2077 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: - • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 38 • Number of submissions accepted: 25 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 65,8 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 23 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Pozdeeva Ekaterina Affiliation: Engineer, State Marine Technical University, St.-Petersburg Email : [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2053 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) - All the review process was done single-blind through Microsoft CMT platform. Average three reviewers involved for each paper. In the CMT system, we provide each reviewer with a Review Questions form. • Conference submission management system: - Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 36 • Number of submissions sent for review: 36 • Number of submissions accepted: 26 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 72.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 53 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Shamsul Sarip Affiliation: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email :[email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2140 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Information System “Conference” • Number of submissions received: 84 • Number of submissions sent for review: 65 • Number of submissions accepted: 39 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 46,4% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 4 • Any additional info on review process: uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Yurchenko Alexey Affiliation: Professor, National Research Tomsk State University, 36, Lenin Avenue Tomsk RUSSIA Email : [email protected] ([email protected])


2021 ◽  
Vol 883 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: a. All papers submitted were checked their similarity index using Turnitin. b. Papers have similarity index more than 25% were rejected. c. After that, the format of the papers was checked. Papers that did not follow the IOP template will be sent back to the authors for revision. d. All papers passed the similarity index and have already follow the IOP template will be sent to the reviewers. e. Reviewers reviewed the papers and give comments to the papers. f. Scientific committee decided if the papers: accepted, accepted with major revision, accepted with minor revision, or rejected. g. Author revised their papers and send back their revision • Conference submission management system: All papers from the conference submitted to using JOTForm Submission System • Number of submissions received: 143 Submission were received • Number of submissions sent for review: 143 Submission was sent for review, and the rest was rejected because out of scope, low-quality articles and high similarity • Number of submissions accepted: 100 Paper accepted based on IOP EES Scope and quality • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): (100/143) × 100 = 69.93 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 Times • Total number of reviewers involved: 21 Reviewer Involved + 4 Editors • Any additional info on review process: NONE • Contact person for queries: Dr. Esther Kembauw, SP., M.Si Pattimura University Email: [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2134 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: easychair.org • Number of submissions received: 63 • Number of submissions sent for review: 59 • Number of submissions accepted: 30 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 51% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 8 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Artem Kruglov Affiliation: Innopolis University Email : [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 855 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Insight-https://insight.klinkhamergroup.com/crossingboundariesconference/account/closed • Number of submissions received: 42 • Number of submissions sent for review: 42 • Number of submissions accepted: 34 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 81% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 55 • Any additional info on review process: n/a • Contact person for queries: Name : Nadia Debie Affiliation: Klinkhamer Group Email : [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) All submitted papers will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers, who are encouraged to give constructive comments and suggestions to the authors. The review is single-blind – the author doesn’t know the names of the reviewers assigned to the review of the paper. The authors of submitted papers will receive the review comments and recommendations and will have a possibility to amend their papers based on the review comments and suggestions and upload the revised versions. If both reviewers indicate that the paper can’t be published then it will not be accepted for publication, however, the talk might be delivered at the Conference if the reviewers specify that in the review. The publication of the papers in the Conference Proceedings is possible only in case the talk is presented at the Conference. • Conference submission management system: - Self-made submission management system • Number of submissions received: Number of full papers submitted for publication in IOP Conference Proceedings - 232 • Number of submissions sent for review: 232 • Number of submissions accepted: 172 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.13% • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.9 • Total number of reviewers involved: 48 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Anastasia Kaptsova Affiliation:ITMO University, Russia Email :[email protected]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document